Breakfast At Tiffany's Theme Bedroom

A Clean lashes with the Pharisees

OUT OF TEMPLE, hypocrites!

Listen kid, these Pharisees never learn.

NOTE: This blog consists of some 20-odd parties to be added in full as time permits. Similarly, we add new comments as inspiration and opportunity.

Originally, this blog, which had reached the figure of 10,000 readers, was under the management of America On Line (AOL) but they terminate its sponsorship of the blogs of his clients, I decided to move my blog under the patronage of Google. I hope to turn the meter readers of this blog soon.

Revise writing to follow, I've noticed that some links to my computer fonts do not work. Try to remedy the situation as soon as possible.

* * * * * *

X.

D fter I would collapse on their heads the four columns which her Villas castles in the air where biblical quotes falsely tried regurtar falsely translated and interpreted to support their collective homophobic obsession, the Pharisees have been left speechless, speechless and without words to refute my arguments. A men.

The Four Columns:

I. The Bible forbids and condemns homosexuality.

False. Evidence from several rabbis, biblical language experts who can read, write and speak the ancient Hebrew Bible, what Christians say falsely identified as homosexuality in the Bible is the usual pagan female and male prostitution in their temples acts which were prohibited in the Hebrew temple.

II. Homosexuality is "unnatural" because the absence of homosexuality in the animal kingdom is "proof / evidence" that the will of God is against homosexuality and the practice of homosexuality among humans is against the laws of nature allegedly dictated by God.

FALSE. 200 years of scientific evidence proves that homosexuality is widely practiced in the animal kingdom.

III. Homosexuality has been universally condemned and prohibited by all civilizations.

FALSE. archaeological evidence, anthropological, sociological, historical and other scientific disciplines proves that homosexuality has been accepted and integrated into civilizations / human societies of ancient civilizations including Egyptians, Greeks, Romans, Japanese, Chinese and Hawaiian.

IV. Homosexuality is a genetic defect and mental health.

FALSE. The science of genetics has not yet gathered enough evidence to reach a definitive conclusion that homosexuality is a genetic defect while the preponderance of scientific evidence in studies of homosexuality suggests that "apparently" there is a genetic cause of homosexuality.

organizations mental health sciences including human sexual behavior does not consider homosexuality as a mental defect.

The Pharisees were a group of Jewish contemporaries of Jesus who mourned believing themselves better than others for their knowledge of the Mosaic law, can recite lengthy passages tracts without error and strict observance of Jewish religious rituals to the smallest gesture and grimace to the point that they gave more importance to the letter of the law that the spirit of the law. Jesus called them hypocrites to their faces, snakes and seed of Satan coming to the end to take his own temple to clean lashes and they reciprocated being instrumental in the accusations against Jesus that led to his arrest, torture and death.

response to the many biblical quotations by the modern Pharisees regurtadas homophobic against gay community, I give them back to following quote from the words of Jesus addressed to the Pharisees of his time.

Matthew 21, Verse 31: "... Jesus said, Verily I say unto you, That the publicans and the harlots go into the kingdom of God ...."

Orajel Adult Side Effects

Scientific Data: Adoption by Gay Military Gay

heterosexualillos The notorious couple of Adam and Eve expelled from the Garden of Eden after having smeared it all. We know very well, if it had been Adam and Jebo, had tied up the snake in a loop around trunk of the tree of knowledge of good and evil he had broached the forbidden fruit in the mouth and set fire to a tree, snake and fruit and we had saved all the roll recounted in the Bible, the imperfection, the aging, disease and death. P

IX.

Recently, a religious painting homophobic cited research by Steven Nock with much chest beating and crowing on the grounds that such research was used as evidence refuting other evidence in favor of the adoption of children by gay parents a lawsuit in Canada against gay marriage.

Unfortunately for him and other homophobic moralists:

(1) academic and professional credentials as well as years of experience of Steven Nock are lower than many of the authors of the research that he claimed to have had " fatal errors "(" fatal flaws ") and

(2) other scientists, Judith Stacey and Timothy Biblarz of academic and professional qualifications higher than Steven Nock made a critique was admitted as evidence by Canadian courts of skills academic, research methodology and findings of mammoth Steven Nock in a lawsuit in the case of Halpern v. Canada in which it was alleged that a law defining the matriomonio as being exclusively between a man and a woman violated the Canadian Charter of Rights and resulting in

freedoms (3) the law was unanimously declared as violating the Charter and that marriages between same-sex couples are legal in Canada.

Original in English: "Professor Nock has Personally Professor Stacey complimented on the quality and Substance of the article on April 28 2001 at the Council on Contemporary Families Conference on research in New York marriage. "

Translation: Professor Nock personally complimented by Professor Stacey quality and substance of the article of April 28, 2001 at the Conference of the Council on Contemporary Families on research Marriage in New York. "

Apparently, the compliment was not reciprocated.

http://www.answers.com/topic/halpern-v-canada

Original in English: "... Halpern v. Canada, [2003] OJ No. 2268 is a famous decision of the Ontario Court of Appeal Where the Court Found That the common law definition of marriage , which defined marriage as between one man and one woman, violated section 15 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms .

The unanimous Court found that the exclusion of same-sex couples was a clear violation of the Charter. In this respect the judgment followed much of what had been ruled elsewhere.

Surprisingly, the Court also held that there was to be no suspension of the remedy and that the new definition allowing same-sex couples to marry would take effect immediately.

Translation: "... Halpern v. Canada, [2003] OJ No. 2268 is a famous decision of the Court of Appeal for Ontario in which the court found that the definition of marriage under the common law (system of laws originated and developed in England and based on court decisions, on the doctrines implicit in those decisions and the customs and usages rather than codified laws and written) that defined marriage as being between a man and a woman , violated section 15 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms Canadian.

The court unanimously found that the exclusion of same-sex couples was a clear violation of Charter. Regarding this decision went much of what had been determinaod by courts elsewhere.

Surprisingly, the court also held that there was to be no suspension of the remedy and that the new definition allowing same-sex couples to marry would take effect immediately ... "

http://www. amptoons.com / blog / files / Affidavit_of_J_Stacey.html

Original in English: "... 3. Recently, we published the co-authored Findings of Our Comprehensive analysis of two Decades of research literature That Investigates the Impact of Sexual Orientation of Parents on Children. Attached as Exhibit "C" to this affidavit is a copy of this study, Judith Stacey and Timothy Biblarz, "(How) Does the Sexual Orientation of Parents Matter?" American Sociological Review (volume 66, number 2, April 2001). . The American Sociological Review is the most prestigious, selective and rigorously reviewed journal in sociology in the United States. It was referee-reviewed in three rounds by seven reviewers. Professor Nock has personally complimented Professor Stacey on the quality and substance of the article on April 28 2001 at the Council on Contemporary Families Conference on marriage research in New York.

4. We have been asked to evaluate the assertions contained in the affidavits of Professors Steven Nock and Craig Hart, filed in the within proceedings. Professor Nock’s affidavit criticizes the methodological adequacy and quality of the social science research on the effects of lesbian and gay parenting on children. Specifically, Professor Nock states that there is inadequate research to conclude whether or not there are any detrimental effects to children with same-sex parents. In this affidavit, we criticize and reject Professor Nock’s assertion that there is no scientifically valid evidence of equal outcomes between children with same-sex parents and children with heterosexual parents. He is simply wrong to say that all of the studies published to date are virtually worthless and unscientific. There is significant, reliable social scientific evidence that lesbian and gay parents are as fit, effective and successful as similar heterosexual parents. The research shows that children fo same-sex coupels are as emotionally healthy and socially adjusted and at least as educationally and socially successful as children raised by heterosexual parents. We conclude that granting same-sex parents the freedom to marry would likely result in positive outcomes for such parents, their children, gay and lesbian people, and society as a whole. We also reject the assertions of Professor Craig Hart. His analysis is intellectually flawed and the studies cited are irrelevant to the issues in this case..."

Traducción: "...3. Recientemente, publicamos los hallazgos de co-autores de nuestro análisis comprensivo de dos décadas de literature investigating the impact of the sexual orientation of parents over their children. Attached as Exhibit "C" to this affidavit is a copy of this study, Judith Stacey and Timothy Biblarz, "(Como) regardless of sexual orientation of the Fathers? The American Sociological Review (volume 66, number 2, April 2001). The American Sociological Review is the most prestigious journal in sociology, selective and rigorously reviewed in the United States. was reviewed by referees in three rounds of seven reviewers. Professor Nock gave a compliment to Professor Stacey for the quality and substance of article of April 28, 2001 at the Conference of the Council on Contemporary Families Marriage in New York.

4. We have been asked to evaluate the assertions contained in the affidavits of the professors Steven Nock and Craig Hart, based in the proceedings. The affidavit of Professor Nock adequación criticizes the methodology and the quality of social science research on the effects of parenting by lesbians and gays. Specifically, Professor Nock says there inadequadas investigations to conclude whether or not there are detrimental effects to children with same-sex parents. In this affidavit, criticize and reject the assertion of Professor Nock no scientifically valid evidence of results between children with same-sex parents and children with heterosexual parents. He is simply wrong to say that all the studies published to date are virtually worthless and unscientific. There are significant social reliable scientific evidence that lesbian and gay parents are as capable, effective and there is as similar heterosexual parents. Research shows that children of same-sex couples are as emotionally healthy and socially well adjusted and, at least as educationally and socially successful as children raised by heterosexual parents. We conclude that granting same-sex parents the freedom to marry the most likely to be positive for those parents, children, gay and lesbian people and society in general. We also reject the teacher's ascerciones Craig Hart. His analysis is intellectually flawed and the studies cited are irrelevant to the issues in this case ... "

The following link, you can read the English legal document submitted to court by Canadian scientists in which research Steven Nock was destroyed by Judith Stacey and Timothy Biblarz.

http://www.amptoons.com/blog/files/Affidavit_of_J_Stacey.html

The following link is the conclusion in the original English in green followed by my translation into English scientists blue Judith Stacey and Timothy Biblarz relacionado con las investigaciones de Steven Nock.

http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2006/09/14/critique-of-nocks-claim-that-all-studies-of-same-sex-parenting-have-fatal-flaws/

Original en Inglés: "...Research in the most rigorously peer-reviewed journals in child development and sociology provide generally accepted social scientific evidence that lesbian and gay parents are as fit, effective and successful as similar heterosexual parents. Likewise these studies find that children of same sex couples are as emotionally healthy and socially adjusted and at least as educationally and socially successful as children raised by heterosexual parents. Research even provides some suggestive evidence that there may be certain hidden advantages that lesbian parents and their children seem to enjoy. There is neither theory nor evidence that leads in the opposite direction.

Therefore, it seems surprising, if not disingenuous, that Professor Nock, who elsewhere emphasizes the benefits of marriage to parents, their children and society, is unwilling to anticipate that the same benefits, or least some of the same benefits, and perhaps additional benefits, would apply to same-sex marriages and their progeny.

Finally we would underscore that the issue before the court concerns the impact of marriage on lesbian and gay parenting. Lesbian and gay people have parented for a long time and will continue to do so. The question is under what conditions. Is it preferable for Them to parent under Conditions of invisibility, conditions of discrimination, or Conditions of Equality? It Is Difficult to imagine how Anyone in Good Faith Could Argue That It is preferable to parent Recognition Without equal access to, social and legal resources, and Other Benefits That Parents and Their Children enjoy ... "

Translation: Research publications childhood development and sociology more rigorously reviewed by peer groups themselves provide evidence social generally accepted that lesbian and gay parents are as capable, effective and successful as parents as are heterosexual parents. Also, these studies find that children of same-sex couples are as emotionally healthy and socially adjusted and, at least, educational and socially successful as children raised by heterosexual parents. Research to provide some suggestive evidence that may have certain advantages not known to lesbian mothers and their children seem to enjoy . There is neither theory nor evidence that driving in the opposite direction.

therefore appears surprising, if not desingenuo, that Professor Nock, who elsewhere emphasizes the benefits of marriage for parents, children and society is not willing to anticipate that the same benefits or at least some of the same benefits apply to same-sex marriages and their progeny.

Finally, we stress that the issue before the court concerns the impact of marriage on parenting by gay and lesbian parents. Lesbian and gay people have raised children for a long time and will continue doing. The question is under what conditions? Is it better that they reared their children under conditions of neglect, discrimination conditions or conditions of inequality? It is difficult to imagine how anyone could argue in good faith that it is preferable to raise children without the Access to equal recognition, social and legal resources and beneificos other parents and children enjoy ... "
Blessed
whenever homophobes think they have found their Cid them win their battles against progress useless universal human rights of the gay community, is that the ends Cid defeated and ridiculed in the public arena.

relation to the brothel with a facade of the Capitol in Puerta de Tierra, where some, supposedly, "honorable" characters in the Puerto Rican narcolegisbasura something notorious for their sordid double life, including domestic violence, adultery shamelessly public fornication in serial litigation paternity, snapper and shout, their litters of bastards and the rest of the roll so common in heterosexual relationships the yard, do not recognize any moral authority to judge these hypocritical politicians to marriages of same-sex couples and reject its entromisiones in the lives of others to curtail human rights of the gay community.

Ohio Licence For Military Expire

Israel Trip

wound Achilles bandaging Patroclus

her lover during the war of Troy.

VIII.

The results of a survey by America On Line (AOL) in which, so far, a total of those who were asked whether they agree with the policy current U.S. armed forces in relation to gays, 60% of the 64.475 who voted NO are in accordance with the policy banning gays in the military while 40% voted YES to agree with the discriminatory policy.

To view the article containing the survey and news of a U.S. Marine decorated for his participation in the war in Iraq is challenging anti-gay policy in the U.S. armed forces, go to the next link http://news .aol.com/topnews/articles/_a/dont-ask-dont-tell-revisited/20070228124709990001? ncid = NWS00010000000001 or equivalent link http://tinyurl.com/2ksozc Tinyurl

to the Motherland of Judeo-Christian homophobia, the very Israel, and does not criminalize homosexuality, or even on its military.

According to the web site http://www.gaymilitary.ucsb.edu/PressCenter/press_rel12.htm :

"... A study entitled" Homosexuality and The Israeli military Furezas': Did the Survey the Gay Ban Undermine the Military Operation? Written by Aaron Belkin, Director for the Center for the Study of Sexual Minorities in the Military Forces of the University of California at Santa Barbara and Melissa Levitt, Associate Professor of Political Science at San Francisco State University.

... None of the 23 nations that allow gay soldiers to serve openly have reported problems ...

... opponents (U.S.) of gays and lesbians in the military say they are irelevantes foreign experiences to determine what would happen if the U.S. lifted its ban, even where it is legal, many homosexuals out of the closet now in units of fighting in foreign armies. (But) As Belkin and Levit, however, known gays serve in combat units of the Israel Defense Forces. They surveyed 136 Israeli combat soldiers and found that 17% knew a homosexual partner in your unit.

Based on interviews with 35 academic experts and officials and a review of 259 government documents and news articles, Belkin and Levitt found no evidence that openly gay soldiers sovacaron military operation, cohesion or morale. Prof. Stuart Cohen, a senior military expert at the Center for Strategic Studies at Bar-Ilan University, told Belkin and Levitt that "homosexuals are not an issue (of conflict) the cohesion of units in the Defence Forces Israel. Indeed, the whole thing is a very marginal to what these armed forces are concerned.

Next, opponents of gay and lesbians in the military say that foreign experiences are irelevantes as gays and lesbians receive special treatment in foreign forces overseas. Based on his Interview in and review of literature, Belkin and Levitt found that despite the lack of perfectly equal treatment in all cases, the majority of the Israeli gay and lesbian soldiers are treated the same as their heterosexual peers most of the time. And, they found no evidence that rare cases of different treatment impaired functioning, cohesion or morale.

Finally, opponents of homosexuals in the military say they are foreign Experiences irelevantes given the uniqueness of American culture culture as well as the United States military. Belkin and Levitt argue that all national cultures are unique. Dadoi that 23 countries have lifted their bans against homosexuality successfully, cultural differences do not seem to determine whether the lifting of bans anti-homoseuxales undermine the military. According

Nathaniel Frank, Director of Communications Center for the Study of Sexual Minorities in the Military, "It has been 27 years since the Dutch army was the first to lift its ban against homosexuals and 22 other countries have followed suit in consequential years. If opponents of gay men and lesbians in the military really believe that undermine the military uprising, why not have produced studies showing that this is the case? "

What had become of the glory that was Greece and the power that was ancient Rome if armies had forbidden his most famous victory and overall such as Alexander the Great and Julius Caesar, among others, being part of the conquest campaigns merely for being gay and bisexual?

Answer: Not so glorious or so powerful.

I think the Pentagon is a hostelling of homophobic, interesting, and ironically, according to scientific studies related to human behavior and mental health indicate that a high percentage of homophobic are actually repressed homosexuals, an issue on which I will elaborate shortly.

Laura Gemser Emanuelle Movie Online

butt homophobes

VII.

Note: Future comments on this blog will relate to gay marriages, adoption and parenting skills of children by gay parents supported by scientific studies and their official statements by professional mental health organizations to As comments on homosexuality in Puerto Rico.

Next, an example of the erroneous interpretation of the words of St. Paul, who claim to champion favorite ban God and the sinfulness of homosexuality. This misunderstanding must be fought to stop the lies and falsehood continue to be used to repress the collective soul of the GLBT community to fight the malicious attempts to prevent the development of gay spirituality and attempts to separate the community GLBT of the Creator who loves them as He created Mismmo.

Many who like to quote biblical passages to argue that homosexuality is a sin, those who quote the words of St. Paul in his letter to the Romans, almost always get two sentences out of context of the issue and begin the full letter appointments with verse 26 and older who says

"... 26 For this reason God gave them up to degrading passions: for their women exchanged natural relations for unnatural relations. 27 Likewise also the men abandoned natural relations with women, burned in their lust with each other, committing shameful acts, men with men and receiving in themselves the penalty corresponding to its Lost .. .

If you start reading from verse 22, it becomes very clear that Paul was speaking of those who committed the sin of idolatry and PUNISHMENT be converted in gay men and lesbians by God for practice Idolatry .

According to Romans 1:22 - 25: "... 22 Professing to be wise they became fools, 23 And changed the glory of the incorruptible God into an IMAGE (IDOLATRAIA) to likeness of corruptible man of birds and animals, and reptiles. 24 SO God gave them up to uncleanness, in the passions of their hearts, to dishonor their bodies among Yes 25 They exchanged the truth of God into a lie, and revered and worshiped the creation (Idolatry) rather than the Creator, who is blessed forever! Amen ... "

Paul's words NO say that homosexuality is a sin, but sin that is Idolatry and the Homosexuality is punishment given by God eat is made clear in the words of the verses 26 and 27:

"... Therefore, God gave them over to shameful lusts ( homosexuality), for even their women exchanged the natural use into that which is against nature." 27 - "And likewise also the men abandoned the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another, men committing shameless acts with men and receiving in themselves the due penalty for their perversion. "

Interestingly, for thousands of years must have been countless same-sex couples viviron all their stocks deliriously happy in ancient cultures where homosexuality was acceptable without being happen that homosexuality was what Paul considered a punishment from God. What Paul presumed not to let the gay community speak for themselves.

are so many "tablibanes" homophobic fundamentalist Christians who can not read the ancient Hebrew resulting in the Bible do not know that the word "men" in the little phrase "all men of the city" that appears in the biblical the destruction of two cities does not specifically refer to all male citizens , but the Hebrew word "Am" means "people" or "nation" (as we say "all people") A people, including people or nation, both men and women like children. With email communications, Rabbi Gershon Caudill explained that the paabra "Am" refers to a group composed of related individuals.

Jewish Rabbi Gershon Caudill, of course, can read, write and speak Hebrew, he said the following (which expressed slightly above) when he asked about the little phrase "all men of Sodom wanted to rape the two angels, Lot's guests.

"... The Hebrew word 'Am means" the people, "or" the nation. "A people or a nation includes Both Men and Women as well as Boy and Girl Children. The word Actually Refers to a group That Is related to Each Other, Kinsmen ... "

THEREFORE, it is a mistake to translate the Hebrew word "Am" and "men" in the sense of beings as exclusively male homophobes so many Christians insist on their ignorance to color the story as if it were an exclusively homosexual rape, attempted ciudanos by all men of Sodom when the reality is that involving a group of men and women where the act of rape was not for the sexual gratification of the rapists, but to humiliate the manhood of the two foreigners hiding in the house of Lot. The rape of warriors defeated by the victorious enemy warriors was common in antiquity was not necessarily for sexual pleasure but for the sake of having power over a defeated enemy. The

delight homophobic fundamentalist Christians quoting the words of Paul in 1 Corinthians 6:9-10:

"... 9 Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor homosexuals , 10 nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor slanderers nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God ... "

Note: Some Bibles, the word "gay" in the quote above is replaced by the word "sodomites."

Ignorance of both homophobic religious painting in the ancient languages \u200b\u200bof the Bible can be seen when they quote the words of Paul in 1 Corinthians 6:9-10 to which I respond with the following quote from a source that obviously very familiar with the vocabulary of biblical Greek and writes in a very polite Castilian:

http://www.cristianshomosexuals.org/castella/documentos/nuevotestamento.htm # corintis

"... Paul in I Corinthians 6: 9-10 and I Timothy 1: 9-10 provides two lists of sins in I Corinthians are those who are excluded from the kingdom, and in I Timothy those who have not received the law of God, in both lists of sins modern translators identify homosexuality. Ichor terms appear in Greek and Arsenokoitai malakoi, and in I Timothy appear only Arsenokoitai: The current translators translate them with a variety of terms ranging from "sodomites" to "child molesters" to "effeminate", "inverted", "prostitutes", "practicing homosexuals" among others. try to bring some order.

word malakos 1 is very common Greek and basically means "soft, weak, weak." In the New Testament appears frequently in the sense of "weak, weak, sick" in a context of moral issue would mean "licentious, profligate, dissolute." It is free to assume that this notion is expressed or exclusively relate to gay people. In fact, in Greek this word was not used to refer to homosexuality. The rooted tradition since Thomas Aquinas is to understand this word 2 in connection with masturbation, this idea has come up well into the twentieth century through Protestant translations. In the most recent translations, since very few moralists believe that masturbation be cause for exclusion in the Kingdom of God so harsh sentence has been moved to a less frequent sexual activity and less accepted socialmente3. The interpretation that currently seems most correct is that designates malakoi immorality, laziness ethics in general.

arsenokoítes4 The term is very strange in Greek, the two primerasocasiones in which they appear are precisely the two quotations from the New Testament that we are dealing, then appears in the Greek patristic. But it is none of the terms that the ancient Greek language used to refer to homosexual practices: first there was a generic term for homosexuality or homosexuals, remember this word came up in the s. XIX (yes had for some practices). Boswell and McNeill believe that originally the term refers to male prostitution, this interpretation is reinforced by the context of the Old Testament, which was associated with certain forms of prostitution in pagan idolatrous worship. Helminiak provides an updated explanation: The Hebrew language has no word to express the idea of \u200b\u200bhomosexuality in a generic sense, the Hebrew expression miƒkav zaxúr served to refer to the synagogue to ban teaching of Leviticus 18: and 20:13, when The rabbis taught or preached in Greek Greek using a tracing built on the above Hebrew expression: arsenokoites: koi-Greek root corresponds to the Hebrew ƒkb-both in the sense of "lie, have sex," and the Greek root arsen-corresponds to the Hebrew zaxur "male, male ";" is a suffix tes5 built male agent name, so that the word is characterized as masculine. If Jesus and the early Christian communities abolished the ritual purity of the Jewish Law, one may wonder why it appears in these letters, apparently is a blatant contradiction. What did the century moralists I dc. When did negative assessments of homosexuality? Thinking in adults copulating with preteens, thinking in children and teenagers kidnapped for the slave trade and for sale and often into prostitution, for that reason it is not necessary to mention the lesbianism, which does not lead to similar abuse. When we today in the s. XX comes to homosexuality we refer to a normal variation of sexual orientation and emotional tipping genitally some people to adults of the same sex, is a definitive and irreversible6 variant. We therefore conclude that Arsenokoitai refers to a type of abusive or exploitative sex. In fact, if he had wanted to describe homosexuality as intrinsically evil, should also make reference to female homosexuality.

1 In I Corinthians 6: 9-10 appears in the plural: malakoí2 mollitia.3 In Latin mollicies or look at how the change in translation is not based on new data or philological exegesis, but a change in attitude on sexual morality 4 In I Corinthians 6: 9-10 i I Timothy 1: 9-10 appears in the plural: arsenokoitai. 5-TES tai singular and plural. 6 In this regard can be found MONDIMORE recent writings as a natural history of homosexuality, Barcelona 1998, editorial Polity Press (original edition Baltimore and London 1996) where they are listed the latest scientific research on homosexuality explained in language accessible to nonspecialists , and How SORIANO live RUBIO Homosexuality and lesbianism, Salamanca 1999, editions Amaru, which is investigated mainly from the psychological point of view, the work is updated and accessible to non-specialists ... "

There are many who cite the words of St. Paul as a guide innerante biblical what they wrongly claim are their views condemning homosexuality but ignore Paul's words about slavery and his words that forbid women to speak and teach in religious congregations. Remember that Paul began his biblical role as mass murderer when persecuted and killed Christians.

But the nonsense of Paul are not limited to the above since Paul also believed to favor of slavery when Timothy instructs the runaway slave, Onesimus, who returns to his master, Philemon, and humbly obey him.

Also, the letter of Paul to the Ephesians 6:5-8, Paul instructs slaves (the word servant in the Greek era slave doulas) to obey their amoscomo Jesus: "... 5 Servants, be obedient to those who are your masters on earth contemor and trembling, in sincerity of heart, as unto Christ, 6 not serving only when you're watching, and those who want to get along with men, but as servants of Christ, doing the will of God with courage. 7 Serve wholeheartedly, as the Lord, not men, 8 knowing that good to do each, that will receive from the Lord, whether slave or free ... "

This same Paul ruled that women had to wear a veil and could not talk for a religious congregation as shown in 1 Corinthians 14: 34 "... women keep silent in the congregations , because not allowed to talk , but are subject, as well as what the law says. 35 If you want to learn about something, ask at home to their own husbands, because the woman is inappropriate to speak at the Congregation ... "

Also, Paul says in 1 Timothy 2: " .. .11 Women learn in silence with all subjection; 12 because permit no woman to teach or exercise authority over man, but to be in Silent io ... "

it is interesting that so many ministers, reverends, preachers and pastors Paul cited both in relation to what they imagine to be speaking out against homosexuality but he ignored their instructions that women do not have to speak or teach in congregations and climb to pulpits of congregations to preach and exercise some control over the men in their congregations.

doñas These same leading congregations and preaching remind other Paul's instructions to women in 2 Timothy 2:9-10: "... 9 also that women adorn themselves in decent clothing, with modesty and prudence, not with braided hair or gold or pearls or expensive clothes ... "

I have seen several of these preachers on television programs doñas climbs in high heels, makeup smeared over the pig of Juan Bobo, with hair braided hair tinted with gold and pearls Alajar and expensive clothes. That are comfortable to throw frogs and snakes against the homosexual community, supposedly quoting Paul while ignoring Paul's instructions related to braided hair and gold jewelry and pearls.

Anyway, as I did not recognize any moral authority to give instructions Pablo social behavior, either, accept their sanctimoniousness related to clothing and adornment of women.

Another thing that many homophobic religious pint repeated ad nauseam is that Paul says that all scripture is inspired by God and, therefore, all the disparate views of Paul are the word of God divine inspiration.

Let me amend that presumption to anoint themselves as spokespersons of the word of God by way of Paul's words. When Paul said that all scripture was inspired by God, he was referring to the Old Testament, because when he said those words, the New Testament had not yet been written.

is interesting that Paul speaks but does not identify something which he refieria as a "thorn in the flesh or eguijón" what and why he begged God to take it off unsuccessfully in 2 Corinthians 12: 7 -9: "12:7 ... And for the greatness of the revelations keep me from exalting, I was given a thorn in my flesh, a messenger of Satan to buffet me, lest I be exalted; 12: 8 in which three different times I begged the Lord to take it away from me. 12:9 And he says: My grace is sufficient for my power is made perfect in weakness. Therefore most gladly I will rather boast in my weaknesses, so that it rests upon me the power of Christ ... "
Considering
like attitude of Paul toward women and sexual prudery," could have been that homosexuality itself sting?

Obviously, someone like Paul who did not condemn the slavery, which had serious prejudices related to gender and women is not a person to whom you can be considered as a credible source of moral authority.

But Paul was not the only one to have crazy ideas about sex, morals and social order. Some religious ridiculeses some can be read at the following site Cyberspace:

http://www.pastornet.net.au/jmm/articles/2105.htm Canto

Petrus (died 1197) believed that having sex with a beautiful woman was a greater sin than with an ugly, because it gave more delight.

St. Thomas Aquinas believed that deviate from the missionary position was worse than relacionessexuales to hold one's own mother.

For those who do not know, the missionary position is the sexual position where the man is lying on top of the woman looking down while she is under the man looking up tothe legs open. For many Christians this is the only decent position Cristiano and heterosexual sex Any deviation from this position is a sexual perversion. Until that arrives

despotism of some Christian fanatics. Unbelievable.

Santa Bernadina of Siena (d. 1440) said that if a woman knows her husband is going to practice coitus interruptus, she has to "resist her husband until death."

Theodore of Tarsus became the penalty for oral sex in penance for life for premeditated murder but solamene seven years.