Tuesday, August 10, 2010

Free Sample Letter From Chruch

Today August 10 we have NO no reason to celebrate independence

Enclosed in this article the text of the Act of "independence" of August 10, 1809, which shows on its face that the actions taken that day are the reaffirmation of the power of the King of Spain on authorities placed by the troops of Napoleon. This is not a declaration of independence as submissive to the Kingdom of Spain. So what friends celebrate independence?

We have to deny and refute the story that told us first by conservative historians and then reinterpreted by Marxist historians. The truth is that true independence of our country should be celebrated with pride on Oct. 9 because on that date in 1820 and in Guayaquil, there were an Act of Independence of the English and the creation of a new country with territory and independent institutions any other.


MINUTES OF THE INDEPENDENCE OF QUITO (1809)
The August 10, 1809 is considered the start of independence what is now Ecuador. In Quito, when the natives rebelled against the president Ruiz de Castilla, ineffectual government declared the hearing, and created a Board of Governors. The neighborhood representatives who participated in the events of August 10, 1809, signed a written report confirming the rebellion and differently organized administration. This paper suggests also an invitation to other cities to ally himself voluntarily in order to form a government representing Acting Supreme Fernando VII, while regaining their freedom.

We, the undersigned representatives of the people who, in the present critical circumstances of the nation, solemnly declare to have ceased to function the existing judges of the capital and provinces, in virtue of the downtown district or Cathedral selected and appointed by the representatives of the Marquis of Selva Alegre and Solander, and signed. Manuel Angulo, Antonio Pineda, Manuel Cevallos, Joaquin de la Barrera, Vicente Paredes, Juan Ante and Valencia. The neighborhood of San Sabastian representative selected and appointed by him to Don Manuel Zambrano, and signed, Nicholas Velez, Francisco Romero, Juan Pino, Lorenzo Romero, Manuel Romero, Miguel Donoso.

The district of San Roque representative selected and appointed by him to the Marquis de Villa Orellana, and signed. Rivadeneira José Ramón Puente, Antonio Bustamante, Jose Alvarez, Diego Mideros.

The neighborhood of San Blas representative selected and appointed by him to Don Manuel de Larrea and signed. Juan Coello, Gregorio Flor de la Bastida, Jose Ponce, Mariano Villalobos, José Bosmediano, Juan Unigarro and Bonilla. The neighborhood of Santa Barbara chose and appointed him representative to the Marquis of Miraflores and signed. Ramon Maldonado, Luis Vargas, Christopher Garces, Toribio Ortega, Antonio Tadeo Arellano, Antonio de Sierra. The neighborhood of San Marcos representing elected and appointed by him to Don Manuel Matheu and signed. Francisco Javier Ascazubi, José Padilla, Nicholas Velez, Nicolas Jimenez, Francisco Villalobos, Juan Barreto. We declare that the above individuals together with representatives of the Councils of the provinces currently subject to this government and voluntarily join her hereafter, as are Guayaquil, Popayán, Pasto, Barbecues and Panama now dependent Viceroyalty of Lima Santa Fe, which seek to attract, make up a Supreme Board acting governor on behalf of and as representative of our legitimate sovereign, the Seventh Don Fernando, while his Majesty and recover the mainland or shall come to prevail in America , selected and appointed by Ministers or Secretaries of State Don Juan de Dios Morales, Manuel Quiroga and Juan de Larrea, the first for the office of foreign affairs and war, the second for Grace and Justice, and the third for Finance, which as such individuals are born of the Supreme Board. This will have a private secretary to vote and so we named Don Vicente Alvarez.

selected and appointed by the President of it to the Marquis of Selva Alegre. The Board as a representative of the Monarch Majesty will be treated as , its president of HSH , and Members of Excellence the less the private secretary who was given the Lordship of . The President shall organize now and while state revenues six thousand dollars of annual salary, two thousand each vowel and a thousand private secretary r. sworn obedience and loyalty to the King in the Cathedral and will immediately pay all constituent bodies and ecclesiastical and secular. Sustain the purity of religion, the rights of the King, and the deadly war home and make all his enemies, mainly French, using few honest ways and means suggested to him the courage and wisdom to achieve victory. The effect and still quite competent military force necessary to keep the Kingdom in respect, will rise soon a phalanx composed of three battalions of infantry on foot and mounted ordinance the first company of grenadiers, thus being renovated and the two infantry the current Dragons squad. The head of the phalanx is Colonel and appointed as a Don Juan Salinas, whom the Board will recognize immediately. We named the Auditor General of War, with honors Lt. Col. Honor treatment and pay 1500 pesos to Juan Pablo Arenas and the Board will recognize him. The proposals will Coronel officers, appointed by the Board, issued its patents and will free the Secretary of War. Phalanx to serve willingly and will not lack what is necessary, the third increase on current salary from the soldier up. For the most prompt and proper administration of justice, it created a Senate composed of two chambers Civil and Criminal Highness treatment. Have at its head a governor with two thousand dollars in salary Your Worship and treatment of Grace. Criminal room a Regent subordinate to the Governor, with two thousand dollars in salary and treatment of Honor, the other ministers with the same treatment and pay 1500 pesos, adding a Protector General of Indians with honors and Senator salary. The treatment Constable and his former salaries. Elected and Appointed such as follows: Civil Court, Governor Don José Javier Ascazubi, Dean, Don Pedro Jacinto Escobar, Jose Salvador, Ignacio Tenorio, Don Bernardo de Leon, Attorney, Don Mariano Merizalde. Assize Court, Regent Philip Strong Love, Dean, Don Luis Quijano, Senators, Jose del Corral Don Victor de San Miguel, Don Salvador Murgueitio, Attorney, Don Francisco Xavier de Salazar. Protector General, Mr. Thomas Arechaga, Sheriff, Don Antonio Solano of the Board. If any of the individuals appointed by the sovereign council resigns his job without just and legitimate cause, the Board is allowed the waiver, if they deem appropriate, but be warned before they will be deemed to be such unpatriotic and vassal and forever excluded any public employment. Disputare which the legitimacy of the Supreme Board constituted by this act shall freely under the protection of the laws in the written grounds and once declared futile, confirmed that the authority is is granted, it ordered him to pay obedience, which is not doing it and will be treated as prisoner of state.

Done and signed at the Royal Palace in Quito on August 10 of 1800 nine, Manuel Angulo, Antonio Pineda, Manuel Cevallos, Joaquin de la Barrera, Vicente Paredes, Juan Ante and Valencia, Nicholas Velez, Francisco Romero, Juan Pino, Lorenzo Romero, Manuel Romero, Miguel Donoso, José Rivadeneira, Ramón Puente, Antonio Bustamante, Jose Alvarez, Juan Coello, Gregorio Flor de la Bastida, Jose Ponce, Mariano Villalobos, Diego Mideros, Vicente Melo, Jose Ponce, José Bosmediano, Juan Unigarro and Bonilla, Ramon Maldonado Luis Vargas, Christopher Garces, Toribio Ortega, Antonio Tadeo Arellano, Antonio de Sierra, Francisco Javier de Ascazubi, José Padilla, Nicolas Jimenez, Francisco Villalobos, Juan Barreto.

Tuesday, July 13, 2010

3.5mm Jack Pinout Diagram

Comments on Higher Education Organization Act

If we want academic freedom, free expression and well-trained professionals by evaluating their merits, the Higher Education Act must be filed definitively. Below I discuss some brief comments on 3 articles of the Law on Higher Education, the text that came to debate II (not the one that arrived today at dawn between cocks and midnight to the Assembly)


Art 4. And rights of students.

Literal a)

Access, movement and residence, graduation, graduating, without discrimination according to their merit.

Contradiction. Academic merit are a form of discrimination that defines who may or may not titrated based on their knowledge and skills. The law allows for certification and completion of mediocre because it prevents discrimination, academic merit or lack of them are just an accessory but not decisive.

Literal b) Have a
education quality and relevance, to obtain a professional qualification in accordance with the development of science and technology and the needs of the country.
Censorship. Regulate the quality, relevance and addiction higher education to the "needs" implies a body which determines the parameters above the legitimate citizens' personal decision, an organization that freely interpret and impose such criteria in the form of mandatory content (censorship).

Literal c)
Count and access to the means and resources for higher education guaranteed by the Constitution.

parasitism. Will be subsidized to any student, good or mediocre (Article 4 paragraph letter a) in resources and means taken from citizens, depriving society of the ability to manage those resources-poor-in an efficient (scholarships for top students, training corporate sponsorship of outstanding students and poor, etc.).

Literal d)
Participate in the process of evaluation and accreditation of his career.

Absurd. They are teachers or certifying agencies who must evaluate students based on their knowledge and skills. No students.

Literal h)
The right to receive education secular, cultural, democratic, inclusive and diverse, that promotes gender equity, justice and peace.

When you point " secular education" is stripped to the right college a general set according to the institutional tradition. It opens up to the prohibition of theology classes, religion, or the like, of any creed.

Literal i)
Get , according to their academic merit scholarships, loans and other forms of financial support that will guarantee equal opportunities in the formation of higher education.

contradicts literal a) and c)



Art 5. Rights of teachers or professors and researchers or research.

Literal a) Exercise
teaching and research under the fullest liberty without any restriction imposed or religious, political, partisan or otherwise.

Censorship. Again, an attack on freedom of religion and freedom of conscience and creates a system of censorship which prevents an institution to have an ideological line, religion, partisan or otherwise.

Literal d.)
Participating in institutional assessment system.

The evaluation system can not be made by judge and jury in the same review committee. The evaluation of teachers and researchers for the institution, or individuals or agencies by the institution for that matter.


Art 7. Aims of Education top

Literals a.) to f.)

It lists a number of attributes, some of which are open to interpretation, the risk is in use, under subjective criteria as reasons to find alleged "failures" institutional and proceed to the warning, intervention, censorship, closure penalty of the school or the separation of the members of it.

Literal g.)
up spaces to strengthen the constitutional state, sovereign, independent, unitary, intercultural, multi-ethnic, secular.

censorship and indoctrination. Again, the violation of freedom of worship and conscience to compel the creation of these "spaces" whose attributes are regulated by the state, freely by the school. Moreover, the education involves critical thinking, skepticism and questioning, even-or especially-in the existing system, its nature, its agencies, mechanisms, ideology, members, etc. Spaces "strengthening the constitutional state" are places of indoctrination and not questioning the current system.

h. literal)
contribute to local and national development on an ongoing basis, through community work or community outreach.

forced labor system. As part of the law becomes mandatory use of resources (monetary, human, technical) a university for "community work", that determined by the State, which must be permanent, without remuneration or compensation provided for by law. Not all institutions can afford the creation of community extensions, there would normally be a cause to warn, intervene, censor, shut down or penalize an institution or its members.

Thursday, April 15, 2010

Waht Does Ohio Drivers License Look Like



By Mary Anastasia O'Grady

Barack Obama's government last week continued his charm offensive directed at the authoritarian governments Latin America by sending Deputy Secretary of the Department of State for Western Hemisphere affairs, Arturo Valenzuela, Ecuador to meet with President Rafael Correa.

Why pay attention to a visit from a middle-ranking diplomat to a banana republic? Because if you know what eluded Honduras last year by refusing to bow to the United States is facing Ecuador. Moreover, Valenzuela's visit shows how little U.S. is willing or can do for people who succumb to the tyranny of the left.

After taking office in 2007, Correa decided to put its popularity Congress above the law. A solid majority of Ecuadorians wanted a new constitution. Correa, however, ruled that the Constituent Assembly that drafted the new document, you should also have broad powers, including authority to dissolve Congress. That triggered a constitutional crisis was resolved in favor of Correa when he used the power of the state and its supporters resorted to violence. If the Ecuadorian armed forces have responded with courage and patriotism displayed their peers Hondurans, today the country could still have a chance for a democracy.

Now that Correa has consolidated his power, government is using intimidation to destroy their opponents. The press is under constant threat, opponents are being driven into exile, the economy is in ruins and has emerged that the Colombian guerrilla FARC Correa government considers an ally. The country also maintains friendly relations with Iran.

Look how the situation got to this point. When Congress Ecuadorian President Rafael Correa said he will not grant the Constituent Assembly the powers he sought, the electoral court, which he controls, dismissed the opposition lawmakers, who were replaced with more compliant members.

The Constitutional Court intervened and ruled that the ousted congressmen should be returned. In response, according to Gabriela Burgos Calderon, a columnist for the daily "El Universo", Guayaquil, "Correa went on the radio and television to say that, despite the decision of the Court, dismissed lawmakers not returning.

In a telephone interview last week, Calderón de Burgos added: "The same day, police forces under government authority and the duty to protect the Court did not act and were easily outnumbered by an angry mob who made his way. Former members of the Court argue that they evidence showing that the police let in the crowd. This was never investigated. Some of the individuals who were members of the Constituent Assembly and are now in Congress, participated in the violent takeover of the Court. We saw on TV to members of the Court to run the building as people on the street were throwing things. "

Using these methods, does not take long to destroy Correa institutional balance of powers that stood in his way to become the Juan Domingo Peron of Ecuador.

The media has been a more difficult problem. In June last year when I reported on unpublished documents obtained by the FARC in Colombia raided a rebel base, indicating collusion between the guerrillas and government of Correa, he jumped out of anger. On a trip to New York next month threatened to "sue" The Wall Street Journal by my column. "We are sick of their lies," he said. Days later, I received a video showing the leader of the FARC, the Mono Jojoy, speaking to his soldiers on how the rebels had supported Correa's campaign. The lawsuit has not yet materialized.

Today, Correa them is making life miserable for Ecuadorian journalists. Since coming to power, his government has taken control of four television channels and created your own. Correa used his pulpit to insult regular intimidation of journalists and attack the personality of their opponents. She also likes to file lawsuits.

When a crowd gathered outside the offices of The Universe in August to intimidate employees because in an article published by the newspaper, Emilio Palacio, a columnist for the newspaper center-left, complained to a subordinate Correa. The president appeared on television to say that the Palace should be sued. The column was then accused of defamation under the Penal Code and sentenced to three years prison.

During Tuesday's meeting before the television cameras, Valenzuela expressed concern about Iran's nuclear ambitions and its budding relationship with Ecuador. According to Reuters, Correa said, "We will not get into that discussion. But what has that to do with selling bananas to Iran, which has to do with that Iran wants to fund certain stations?" Translation: Mahmoud Ahmadinejad is my friend. You do not slip.

"The U.S. response? Valenzuela does not rule out a meeting between Correa and Obama. If that happens, get ready for the second part of the embrace of Obama and Hugo Chávez in Port of Spain, Trinidad and Tobago, in April 2009: More humiliation for the Americans who used to believe in their government as a noble defender of liberty against tyrants.

brief

Tuesday, April 6, 2010

Saudia Arabian Escorts

Ecuador El Chavez Attorneys for the plaintiffs against Texaco committed fraud

So in many cases, the news appeared on many national and international media, but the truth comes to light and those who have made corruption their way of life end up being exposed.

I have received the press release in full Texaco on the obvious fraud incurred by lawyers for the environmentalists who are suing Texaco, whose desire is not justice and the pursuit of a clean environment (in which case they would have sued Petroecuador, caused the Amazonian Chernobyl and current major pollutant of the jungle), no, your appetite is easy money, where this is easier : exploiting prejudice against large companies to demand millions and unjustified repairs that do not serve to improve the quality of life of communities, except to improve the pockets of a handful of plaintiffs and their crafty lawyers.

below the press release of Chevron - Texaco

reveals the plaintiffs Perito fraud on the part of lawyers in the trial of Ecuador


SAN RAMON, Calif., April 5, 2010 - Last week, the technical expert revealed original plaintiffs in a sworn statement that lawyers for the plaintiffs who brought the case against Chevron Corp. (NYSE: CVX) fraudulent reporting an Ecuadorian court alleging the presence of hazardous contamination in oil wells Amazonia.

Dr. Charles W. Calmbacher, a biologist and hygienist American industrialist, who was the first expert instructed on behalf of plaintiffs in the lawsuit against Chevron in Lago Agrio, Ecuador, testified last week in a statement ordered by a U.S. federal court, the reports related to inspections of wells Sacha Shushufindi 94 and 48, were presented on their behalf without their knowledge or authorization. Dr. Calmbacher said he had never concluded that the wells represent a risk to human health or the environment, and that their views were known to the legal and technical equipment of the plaintiffs in Ecuador. However, plaintiffs' attorneys had conflicting reports on the conclusions of Dr. Calmbacher and used signature under false pretenses, months after completing their participation in the case.

"Your own expert has declared that two of the first reports of the claimants are fraudulent, which confirms that the trial in Ecuador has been corrupted from the start," said Hewitt Pate, vice president and general counsel for Chevron. "Chevron will ask the Lago Agrio court challenging the false reports on Sacha plaintiffs Shushufindi 94 and 48, and require the authorities to investigate these improper actions."

After filing the lawsuit against Chevron in 2003, both Lawyers for the plaintiffs and the court Dr. Calmbacher appointed to conduct the judicial inspections of oil wells in the former concession area of \u200b\u200bPetroecuador-Texaco Petroleum Co. in order to assess the environmental damage of course. Dr. Calmbacher was in charge of these inspections on behalf of the plaintiffs and oversaw the removal of soil and water samples from August to October 2004.

fraudulent reports were submitted in February and March 2005 and later used by Richard Cabrera, who was appointed as an expert by the court in Lago Agrio, in his report which estimated that damages against Chevron amounted to USD27. 000 million. Cabrera never investigated or Sacha Shushufindi 94 or 48; however, specified more than USD101 million in damages on the basis of findings invented. Dr. Calmbacher also inspected Sacha Sacha 6 and 21, however, lawyers for the plaintiffs did not submit the report with its findings on these wells. Dr. Calmbacher said it found no risk to human health or the environment or other cleaning that was necessary in any of the sites previously remediated by Texaco Petroleum and inspected by him. He said he had never stated that the remediation carried out in Ecuador in the '90s by Texaco Petroleum, had not been successful.

In his statement March 29 testimony required by the U.S. federal court, Dr. Calmbacher said it sent blank pages with your initials and his signature to the plaintiffs' legal team by courier, in late 2004, for reporting that he believed would contain their true findings. Dr. Calmbacher also ruled that the plaintiffs' attorneys never informed him that the court in Lago Agrio had asked to answer questions about the reports, after being presented with his signature in 2005.

Chevron has long said that the trial is without merit and is marred by numerous irregularities and fraud. In September last year, the company filed a complaint with the Permanent Court of Arbitration at The Hague, claiming that management by Ecuador in Lago Agrio trial violates the Bilateral Investment Treaty between the United States and Ecuador.

can access the full testimony under oath by Dr. Calmbacher in www.chevron.com / Ecuador / depo. Pdf . For more information on the trial of Ecuador, visit www.chevron.com / Ecuador .

Chevron is one of the leading global integrated energy, with operating subsidiaries worldwide. The company's success is supported the ingenuity and commitment of its employees and its application of innovative technology in the world. Chevron participates in virtually all aspects of energy. Explores, produces and transports crude oil and natural gas, refines, markets and distributes transportation fuels and other energy products, produces and sells petrochemical products, generating electricity and geothermal energy; seeking energy efficiency solutions and develop energy sources for future, including biofuels. Chevron is headquartered in San Ramon, California. For more information about Chevron, please visit: www.chevron.com .