XVI. Reviewing the appointment of "authority" Catholic who appeared in the previous section
"3. Myth and echo to follow respond to the parts I've listed the
(1) to
(4) .
"...
(1) Judeo-Christian tradition, whose principles were the basis for the founding of the Western states, has condemned homosexuality as an abomination before God.
(2) This does not mean that homosexuals should be mistreated or denied their civil rights (some of which may be limited for disorderly conduct impairs the physical or moral integrity of others, such as children);
(3) but it means that our culture is in accordance with the tradition of all civilized societies when they disapprove of homosexual conduct or oppose it.
(4) What is really new is the unprecedented power, politics and culture, the militant homosexual movement. Those who disapprove of homosexuality had never been threatened by the loss of their freedom of speech and belief, simply because of their convictions ... "
answer: (1) needed to correct this claim saying that you can remove the word "Jewish" to the phrase "Judeo-Christian" because we have educated opinion of an expert in the original language of the Bible, Hebrew, to see the truth that Jewish tradition did not provide similar condemnation of homosexuality.
Also, you can take the argument up the presumption of "authority" to speak for God Catholic declaring that homosexuality is an abomination before God when a serious study of the sacred writings of the Old Testament in the original Hebrew by experts like Rabbi Gershon Caudill in biblical language that gives evidence that homosexuality itself is not such an abomination before God.
was not the homosexuality itself that was an abomination before God, but rather was the practice of feminine and male prostitution in pagan temples of the neighboring countries of ancient Israel to what the Old Testament referred to as an abomination because it was prohibited from forming part of religious worship the God of the Hebrews.
I will soon devote a section to the confusion between homosexuality and prostitution sacred forbidden in the Bible on which I commented briefly in section IV of this blog because of a knowingly false translation by the homophobic Christian translators
Hebrew words "quedeshim" and
"quedheshah" that are masculine and feminine plural forms respectively of the same word "qadesh"
meant "holy person" or "holy person" cultic prostitutes in temples pagan but the words were translated into
"sodomites " and "whores" with different meanings but the root word
"qadesh" meant holy person or sacred.
ironic that something is holy or sacred by some, that the same thing is sinful and an abomination to others.
Next, repeat a quote that appears in Section II of this blog of Rabbi Gershon Caudill that a child was taught to read, write and speak the original language of the Bible and the language of their ancestors, the Hebrew. In addition to learning to read, write and speak Hebrew, Rabbi Gershon Caudill for their religious education at a Jewish school known as a "yeshiva" studied the details of the Jewish religious and cultural traditions from the time of the ancient Hebrews.
"... Over the past decade, I have been involved in a study of so-called anti-gay texts of Leviticus in the Hebrew original versions, the Dead Sea scrolls and with the help of a Catholic priest and a student Protestant biblical languages \u200b\u200bat Emory University, have studied translations of Leviticus texts in Greek and Latin. This study has led to review Hebrew texts of the Talmud and other collateral material nature to the subject being studied, the history, anthropology, archeology , philology and etymology, to name a few.
As a result of my research, I am convinced of two things:
1. HEBREWS ORIGINAL TEXTS HAVE NO ABSOLUTELY ANYTHING TO DO WITH HOMOSEXUALITY. 2. The texts (Leviticus and Deuteronomy) were used by teachers and rabbis of the Jewish religious tradition to condemn homosexuality only to a much later date, around 1,500 years after it was written. This change in direction occurred between the 4th century and the century
6 under the THREAT of the dominant and controlling governmental authorities and Christian ecclesiastical . The theologians of the church needed to have perceived the Jewish interpretation of the texts as being in accordance with their own comments and teachings concerning homosexuality and what they (falsely) believed to be a sexual perversion ... "
answer: (2) The same is true of the civil rights of heterosexuals than equal and reciprocal to heterosexuals whose civil rights must be limited for disorderly conduct impairs the physical or moral integrity of other persons, including children as statelet point to heterosexual men being the most committed crimes of sexual violence against children, including incest with his own offspring of both sexes, according to newspaper reports, radio and television here in Puerto Rico, is checked against the many cases of parents supporting their daughters incest with children and even infants.
http://www.hiperactivos.com/entrevistas.shtml ".. Most of the sexual abuse against children is actually done by heterosexuals . abuse committed by pedophiles - vary little statistical studies - does not reach beyond 33 to 35 percent of cases of sexual abuse. What does mean? That about 65 percent are committed by heterosexual male adults, who come to make the call by election or pedophilia pedophilia reactive hard due to substance abuse, in situations of stress or availability ... "
The following information is merely an appointment very short for a document that is worth $ 30.00 off the internet but enough to know that there is published scientific evidence that shows the difference between homosexuality and pedophilia and are not synonymous as the troglodytes homophobic claim in its infancy unfounded.
The link
http://www.springerlink.com/content/t028671k3114347j/ , following the Sexual
Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment (Abuso Sexual: Una Revista de Investigación y Tratamiento):
"...Abstract Homosexual (androphilic) and pedophilic men differ in a number of ways and two sets of differences are discussed in this presentation. Results from the literature suggests that there are neurological and endocrine abnormalities in pedophilia but not in androphilia. In contrast, some research suggests that homosexuality may have a genetic basis, whereas there is no evidence to date for a genetic factor in pedophilia..."
Traducción: "...hombres homosexuales (andrófilos) y hombres pedófilos del abstracto se diferencian en un número de maneras y dos clases differences are discussed in this presentation. Results of the literature suggests that there is neurological and endocrine abnormalities in pedophilia but not in the androfília (homosexuality). By contrast, some research suggests that homosexuality may have a genetic basis as there is no evidence so far to a genetic factor in pedophilia ... "
answer: (3) what?
depends on the kind of disapproval and opposition. If we limit the disapproval and opposition to a mere expression of opinion since, well, we will consider freedom of expression. But if disapproval and opposition to homosexuality is aimed at preventing the free practice of homosexuality between consenting adults through legislation that would result in the criminalization of the practice, then, is invading the personal sovereignty of others and, consequently, it is violating civil rights and homosexual community's human, which is not acceptable and will not be tolerated under any conditions for the gay community.
recently in Puerto Rico was a noisy protest by homophobic religious pint of the patio because lawmakers were considering changes to the law 103 of CódigoPenal of Puerto Rico that punished sodomy.
View Http://www.nacla.org/art_display.php?art=371&nacla_Session
= For more information on the challenge Article 103 of the Penal Code of Puerto Rico against sodomy in Puerto Rico which defines sodomy as
" ... any person who had sex with someone of the same sex or commits the crime against nature with a human being. " The term against nature, which comes from Latin, including oral and anal sex between heterosexual and all homosexual practice, which are penalized with mandatory sentences of ten years. In fact, the law punishes any actosexual other than penile-vaginal penetration ... "
Before the politicians the yard could be sold to terrorists homophobic Christian fundamentalists, the Supreme Court of the United States declared unconstitutional any law banning sodomy between consenting adult heterosexuals and homosexuals in all states, territories, possessions, including Puerto Rico booty leaving the local homophobic blowing a mere academic rhetoric to the four winds and removing the U.S. from the list of "Western States" from the "authority" claiming
Catholic "... The Judeo-Christian traditions, whose principles were the Based on the founding of the Western states, has condemned homosexuality as an abomination before God ... "
(4) After centuries of being persecuted, arrested, charged, tried, fined, robbed, imprisoned, tortured and even killed by the most inhuman and being burned alive in the name of God to love according to their sexual orientation by wild packs of homophobic falsely using the Bible as an excuse to satisfy their prejudices and to carry out the cruel injustice, the gay community has gained its human rights which will allow not terminate, but those beliefs albuergan reliogiosas homophobic will be limited to preach the same within the confines of their congregations where they can keep vomiting all toads and snakes that they please from their pulpits and not trying to invade the streets to disrupt public peace, offend the sensitivities and insult the dignity of the homosexual community with their hatred, let alone invade the legislature where liability of our Constitution and the United States must be a clear separation between church and state.
addition, they can not recognize the current legislature any moral authority to interfere in the private lives of others to impose their views when their hypocritical moralistic sexual slip fornication, adultery and bastardy spawn of have been high-level under the ostensibly national awards in honor of their evil llamadao PROESA in field of "love" and "manhood" and the known episodes of domestic violence narcolegisladrones are some public notoriety.
The first world civilized countries of the European Union require all its members and any country that seeks to join them eliminate the criminalization of homosexuality in their legal codes.
To read more of homophobic Christian terrorists are being brought under control by the police forces of the civilized countries of the first world, access the following.
http://www.mscperu.org/archives/2004_09_01_archive.html "... Pastor sentenced to prison for calling homosexuals abnormal.
Stockholm, Sweden, (Aciprensa) Swedish Evangelical organizations have strongly protested against the government's decision to send officials to jail an evangelical pastor who had the "audacity" to preach what the Bible teaches about the homosexuality. According to agency reports Ecumenical News International, Pastor Ake Green, a member of the Pentecostal movement, has been sentenced to one month imprisonment for describing homosexuality as "abnormal, a horrible cancerous tumor in the body of society" during a sermon in clearly explaining the Gospel teaching on homosexuality, especially Pauline passage in I Corinthians 6.9 *. As his words offended some homosexuals, Green was convicted and sentenced as unaambigua law against "incitement to violence." Soren Andersson, president of the Swedish Federation for the rights of gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender people, said they "strongly agree" with the decision because, he said, "religious freedom should not be used to offend people ... "
That much the delight homophobic fundamentalist Christians quoting the words of Paul in 1 Corinthians 6:9-10 But the more I delight I expose their ignorance. * I Corinthians 9-10
"... 9 Do not know that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor homosexuals, 10 nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor slanderers nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God ... " Note: In some Bibles, the word 'homsexuales" in the quote above is replaced by the word "sodomites."
Ignorance of both homophobic religious painting in the ancient languages \u200b\u200bof the Bible can be seen when they quote the words of Paul in 1 Corinthians 6:9-10 to which I respond with the following quote from a source that obviously very familiar with the vocabulary of biblical Greek and writes in a very polite Castilian:
http://www.cristianshomosexuals.org/castella/documentos/nuevotestamento.htm # corintis "... Paul in I Cor 6: 9-10 and I Timothy 1: 9-10 provides two lists of sins in I Corinthians are those who are excluded from the kingdom, and in I Timothy those who have not received the law of God; both lists of sins modern translators identify homosexuality. Ichor terms appear in Greek and Arsenokoitai malakoi, and appear only in I Timothy Arsenokoitai: The current translators translate them with a variety of terms ranging from "sodomites" to "corrupt child "to" effeminate "," inverted "," prostitutes "," practicing homosexuals "among others. Let's bring some order.
word malakos 1 is very common in Greek and basically means" soft, weak, weak ". In NuevoTestamento appears frequently in the sense of" weak, weak, sick "in a context of moral issue would mean" licentious, profligate, dissolute ". It is free to assume that this notion is expressed or exclusively relate to homosexuals. In fact the Greek this word was not used to refer to homosexuality. The rooted tradition since Thomas Aquinas is to understand the word 2 relative with masturbation, this idea has come up well into the twentieth century through Protestant translations. In the most recent translations, since very few moralists believe that masturbation is a cause of exclusion in the Kingdom of God as harsh sentence has been moved to sexual unaactividad less frequent and less accepted socialmente3. The interpretation that currently seems most correct is that designates malakoi immorality, laziness ethics in general.
arsenokoítes4 The term is very strange in Greek, the first two times shown are precisely the two quotations from the New Testament that we are dealing, then appears in the Greek patristic. But it is not any terms that the ancient Greek language used to refer to homosexual practices: first there was a generic term for homosexuality or homosexuals, remember that this word came up in the s. XIX (yes had for some practices). Boswell and McNeill believe that originally the term refers to male prostitution, this interpretation is reinforced by the context of the Old Testament, which was associated with certain forms of prostitution in pagan idolatrous worship. Helminiak provides an updated explanation: The Hebrew language has no word to express the idea of \u200b\u200bhomosexuality in a generic sense, the expression zaxúr miƒkav Serbian Hebrew to refer to the synagogue to ban teaching of Leviticus 18: and 20:13, when the rabbis taught or preached in Greek Greek wore a replica built on the above expresiónhebrea: arsenokoites: koi-Greek root corresponds with the Hebrew ƒkb-both in the sense of "lie, have sex," and the Greek root arsen-is the Hebrew correspondecon zaxur "masculine, male" is a suffix-tes5 builds male agent name, so the word is characterized as masculine. If Jesus and the early Christian communities delaLey abolished Jewish ritual purity, the question remains what appears in these Epistles, apparently is a blatant contradiction. What did the century moralists I dc. When did negative assessments of homosexuality? Thinking in adults copulating with tweens, children and adolescents believed kidnapped for the slave trade and for sale and often into prostitution, for that reason it is not necessary to mention the lesbianism, which does not lead to similar abuse. When we today in the s. XX comes to homosexuality we refer to a normal variation of sexual orientation and emotional tipping genitally some people to adults of the same sex, is a definitive and irreversible6 variant. We therefore conclude that refers Arsenokoitai a kindof abusive or exploitative sex. In fact, if he had wanted to describe homosexuality as intrinsically evil, should also make reference to female homosexuality.
1 In I Corinthians 6: 9-10 appears in the plural: malakoí2 mollitia.3 In Latin mollicies or look at how the change in translation is not based on new data or philological exegesis, but a change in attitude on sexual morality 4 In I Corinthians 6: 9-10 i I Timothy 1: 9-10 appears in the plural: arsenokoitai. 5-TES tai singular and plural. 6 In this regard can be found MONDIMORE recent writings as a natural history of homosexuality, Barcelona 1998, editorial Polity Press (first Baltimore and London original edition 1996) where they are listed the latest scientific research on homosexuality explained in language accessible to nonspecialists, and RUBIO SORIANO's life like homosexuality and lesbianism, Salamanca 1999, editions Amaru, which is investigated mainly from the psychological standpoint, the work is updated and accessible to non-specialists ... "
In concluding this section and responding to the quotation from 1 Corinthians 6:9-10 by religious homophobes, I answer with a biblical passage quoted in an earlier section of this blog.
Matthew, Chapter 21, Versículo31 :"... Jesus said, Verily I say unto you, That the publicans and the harlots go into the kingdom of God ... "
A Who does not like the broth, it is given three cups. 
