How Much Drag Is In A Drag Suit

Traditional Family and Divorce Divorce and

Who does not Like the soup, it is given three cups.

PART III. - The third cup of broth. That banquet.


a little while ago a flock of cockatoos homophobic are landing on the steps of brothel facade of the Capitol in Puerta de Tierra, Puerto Rico, and some of its leaders have the nerve to enter the Capitol to try to impose through legislation and amendments to the constitution their ignorant and false beliefs to the entire country including those who do not share their peculiar and particular religious beliefs by threatening lawmakers to campaign against him.

Things you need to protect the separation between the secular state and the churches.

Last night I saw in a television news report in the cathedral in Old San Juan in which a partner who had chosen them as examples of traditional heterosexual marriage that had been together for 75 years and the testimony of another couple that argued in favor of Amendment 99 to raise a constitutional level only defines marriage as being between a man and a woman.

Unfortunately, the old man of the couple's marriage of 75 years, when a reporter asked if there was never a single slip further during their marriage, the old man grinning from ear to ear, put her finger to her lips and said something about the effect of "Shut up boy who learns the lady."

I, of course, my old man realized that the adulterer had declared before the whole country and everyone laughed grace you all as hypocrites traicionadose their campaign for Amendment 99 to, supposedly to "protect the institution marriage "and that adultery is one of the most common reasons for a marriage diviorcio.

Actually, the premise of promoting Amendment 99, which must "protect the institution of marriage" deserves to be put under fire with a magnifying glass because between the lines meaning the little phrase "protect the institution of marriage "is that partners of men with men and women with women are a threat to the institution of marriage and family, prohibiting recognition of marriage to same-sex couples are protecting heterosexual marriage, traditional family and hence the spread of mankind.

That basophils.

How can you fit on the head of any intelligent being that by the mere fact that there was gay marriage that would prevent the possible effect of sex marriages and make existing heterosexual marriages end in divoricio? If the lasting union of a heterosexual marriage dependent the absence of gay couples, then it is logical to assume that the bonds of affection that bind to heterosexual couples are very weak and easily influenced by outside relationships.

What nonsense.

Obviously, Amendment 99 will not serve to protect heterosexual marriage. The only thing that can save any marriage, heterosexual or homosexual, is the quality of affection between the couple themselves. PERIOD.