Orajel Adult Side Effects

Scientific Data: Adoption by Gay Military Gay

heterosexualillos The notorious couple of Adam and Eve expelled from the Garden of Eden after having smeared it all. We know very well, if it had been Adam and Jebo, had tied up the snake in a loop around trunk of the tree of knowledge of good and evil he had broached the forbidden fruit in the mouth and set fire to a tree, snake and fruit and we had saved all the roll recounted in the Bible, the imperfection, the aging, disease and death. P

IX.

Recently, a religious painting homophobic cited research by Steven Nock with much chest beating and crowing on the grounds that such research was used as evidence refuting other evidence in favor of the adoption of children by gay parents a lawsuit in Canada against gay marriage.

Unfortunately for him and other homophobic moralists:

(1) academic and professional credentials as well as years of experience of Steven Nock are lower than many of the authors of the research that he claimed to have had " fatal errors "(" fatal flaws ") and

(2) other scientists, Judith Stacey and Timothy Biblarz of academic and professional qualifications higher than Steven Nock made a critique was admitted as evidence by Canadian courts of skills academic, research methodology and findings of mammoth Steven Nock in a lawsuit in the case of Halpern v. Canada in which it was alleged that a law defining the matriomonio as being exclusively between a man and a woman violated the Canadian Charter of Rights and resulting in

freedoms (3) the law was unanimously declared as violating the Charter and that marriages between same-sex couples are legal in Canada.

Original in English: "Professor Nock has Personally Professor Stacey complimented on the quality and Substance of the article on April 28 2001 at the Council on Contemporary Families Conference on research in New York marriage. "

Translation: Professor Nock personally complimented by Professor Stacey quality and substance of the article of April 28, 2001 at the Conference of the Council on Contemporary Families on research Marriage in New York. "

Apparently, the compliment was not reciprocated.

http://www.answers.com/topic/halpern-v-canada

Original in English: "... Halpern v. Canada, [2003] OJ No. 2268 is a famous decision of the Ontario Court of Appeal Where the Court Found That the common law definition of marriage , which defined marriage as between one man and one woman, violated section 15 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms .

The unanimous Court found that the exclusion of same-sex couples was a clear violation of the Charter. In this respect the judgment followed much of what had been ruled elsewhere.

Surprisingly, the Court also held that there was to be no suspension of the remedy and that the new definition allowing same-sex couples to marry would take effect immediately.

Translation: "... Halpern v. Canada, [2003] OJ No. 2268 is a famous decision of the Court of Appeal for Ontario in which the court found that the definition of marriage under the common law (system of laws originated and developed in England and based on court decisions, on the doctrines implicit in those decisions and the customs and usages rather than codified laws and written) that defined marriage as being between a man and a woman , violated section 15 of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms Canadian.

The court unanimously found that the exclusion of same-sex couples was a clear violation of Charter. Regarding this decision went much of what had been determinaod by courts elsewhere.

Surprisingly, the court also held that there was to be no suspension of the remedy and that the new definition allowing same-sex couples to marry would take effect immediately ... "

http://www. amptoons.com / blog / files / Affidavit_of_J_Stacey.html

Original in English: "... 3. Recently, we published the co-authored Findings of Our Comprehensive analysis of two Decades of research literature That Investigates the Impact of Sexual Orientation of Parents on Children. Attached as Exhibit "C" to this affidavit is a copy of this study, Judith Stacey and Timothy Biblarz, "(How) Does the Sexual Orientation of Parents Matter?" American Sociological Review (volume 66, number 2, April 2001). . The American Sociological Review is the most prestigious, selective and rigorously reviewed journal in sociology in the United States. It was referee-reviewed in three rounds by seven reviewers. Professor Nock has personally complimented Professor Stacey on the quality and substance of the article on April 28 2001 at the Council on Contemporary Families Conference on marriage research in New York.

4. We have been asked to evaluate the assertions contained in the affidavits of Professors Steven Nock and Craig Hart, filed in the within proceedings. Professor Nock’s affidavit criticizes the methodological adequacy and quality of the social science research on the effects of lesbian and gay parenting on children. Specifically, Professor Nock states that there is inadequate research to conclude whether or not there are any detrimental effects to children with same-sex parents. In this affidavit, we criticize and reject Professor Nock’s assertion that there is no scientifically valid evidence of equal outcomes between children with same-sex parents and children with heterosexual parents. He is simply wrong to say that all of the studies published to date are virtually worthless and unscientific. There is significant, reliable social scientific evidence that lesbian and gay parents are as fit, effective and successful as similar heterosexual parents. The research shows that children fo same-sex coupels are as emotionally healthy and socially adjusted and at least as educationally and socially successful as children raised by heterosexual parents. We conclude that granting same-sex parents the freedom to marry would likely result in positive outcomes for such parents, their children, gay and lesbian people, and society as a whole. We also reject the assertions of Professor Craig Hart. His analysis is intellectually flawed and the studies cited are irrelevant to the issues in this case..."

Traducción: "...3. Recientemente, publicamos los hallazgos de co-autores de nuestro análisis comprensivo de dos décadas de literature investigating the impact of the sexual orientation of parents over their children. Attached as Exhibit "C" to this affidavit is a copy of this study, Judith Stacey and Timothy Biblarz, "(Como) regardless of sexual orientation of the Fathers? The American Sociological Review (volume 66, number 2, April 2001). The American Sociological Review is the most prestigious journal in sociology, selective and rigorously reviewed in the United States. was reviewed by referees in three rounds of seven reviewers. Professor Nock gave a compliment to Professor Stacey for the quality and substance of article of April 28, 2001 at the Conference of the Council on Contemporary Families Marriage in New York.

4. We have been asked to evaluate the assertions contained in the affidavits of the professors Steven Nock and Craig Hart, based in the proceedings. The affidavit of Professor Nock adequación criticizes the methodology and the quality of social science research on the effects of parenting by lesbians and gays. Specifically, Professor Nock says there inadequadas investigations to conclude whether or not there are detrimental effects to children with same-sex parents. In this affidavit, criticize and reject the assertion of Professor Nock no scientifically valid evidence of results between children with same-sex parents and children with heterosexual parents. He is simply wrong to say that all the studies published to date are virtually worthless and unscientific. There are significant social reliable scientific evidence that lesbian and gay parents are as capable, effective and there is as similar heterosexual parents. Research shows that children of same-sex couples are as emotionally healthy and socially well adjusted and, at least as educationally and socially successful as children raised by heterosexual parents. We conclude that granting same-sex parents the freedom to marry the most likely to be positive for those parents, children, gay and lesbian people and society in general. We also reject the teacher's ascerciones Craig Hart. His analysis is intellectually flawed and the studies cited are irrelevant to the issues in this case ... "

The following link, you can read the English legal document submitted to court by Canadian scientists in which research Steven Nock was destroyed by Judith Stacey and Timothy Biblarz.

http://www.amptoons.com/blog/files/Affidavit_of_J_Stacey.html

The following link is the conclusion in the original English in green followed by my translation into English scientists blue Judith Stacey and Timothy Biblarz relacionado con las investigaciones de Steven Nock.

http://www.amptoons.com/blog/archives/2006/09/14/critique-of-nocks-claim-that-all-studies-of-same-sex-parenting-have-fatal-flaws/

Original en Inglés: "...Research in the most rigorously peer-reviewed journals in child development and sociology provide generally accepted social scientific evidence that lesbian and gay parents are as fit, effective and successful as similar heterosexual parents. Likewise these studies find that children of same sex couples are as emotionally healthy and socially adjusted and at least as educationally and socially successful as children raised by heterosexual parents. Research even provides some suggestive evidence that there may be certain hidden advantages that lesbian parents and their children seem to enjoy. There is neither theory nor evidence that leads in the opposite direction.

Therefore, it seems surprising, if not disingenuous, that Professor Nock, who elsewhere emphasizes the benefits of marriage to parents, their children and society, is unwilling to anticipate that the same benefits, or least some of the same benefits, and perhaps additional benefits, would apply to same-sex marriages and their progeny.

Finally we would underscore that the issue before the court concerns the impact of marriage on lesbian and gay parenting. Lesbian and gay people have parented for a long time and will continue to do so. The question is under what conditions. Is it preferable for Them to parent under Conditions of invisibility, conditions of discrimination, or Conditions of Equality? It Is Difficult to imagine how Anyone in Good Faith Could Argue That It is preferable to parent Recognition Without equal access to, social and legal resources, and Other Benefits That Parents and Their Children enjoy ... "

Translation: Research publications childhood development and sociology more rigorously reviewed by peer groups themselves provide evidence social generally accepted that lesbian and gay parents are as capable, effective and successful as parents as are heterosexual parents. Also, these studies find that children of same-sex couples are as emotionally healthy and socially adjusted and, at least, educational and socially successful as children raised by heterosexual parents. Research to provide some suggestive evidence that may have certain advantages not known to lesbian mothers and their children seem to enjoy . There is neither theory nor evidence that driving in the opposite direction.

therefore appears surprising, if not desingenuo, that Professor Nock, who elsewhere emphasizes the benefits of marriage for parents, children and society is not willing to anticipate that the same benefits or at least some of the same benefits apply to same-sex marriages and their progeny.

Finally, we stress that the issue before the court concerns the impact of marriage on parenting by gay and lesbian parents. Lesbian and gay people have raised children for a long time and will continue doing. The question is under what conditions? Is it better that they reared their children under conditions of neglect, discrimination conditions or conditions of inequality? It is difficult to imagine how anyone could argue in good faith that it is preferable to raise children without the Access to equal recognition, social and legal resources and beneificos other parents and children enjoy ... "
Blessed
whenever homophobes think they have found their Cid them win their battles against progress useless universal human rights of the gay community, is that the ends Cid defeated and ridiculed in the public arena.

relation to the brothel with a facade of the Capitol in Puerta de Tierra, where some, supposedly, "honorable" characters in the Puerto Rican narcolegisbasura something notorious for their sordid double life, including domestic violence, adultery shamelessly public fornication in serial litigation paternity, snapper and shout, their litters of bastards and the rest of the roll so common in heterosexual relationships the yard, do not recognize any moral authority to judge these hypocritical politicians to marriages of same-sex couples and reject its entromisiones in the lives of others to curtail human rights of the gay community.

Ohio Licence For Military Expire

Israel Trip

wound Achilles bandaging Patroclus

her lover during the war of Troy.

VIII.

The results of a survey by America On Line (AOL) in which, so far, a total of those who were asked whether they agree with the policy current U.S. armed forces in relation to gays, 60% of the 64.475 who voted NO are in accordance with the policy banning gays in the military while 40% voted YES to agree with the discriminatory policy.

To view the article containing the survey and news of a U.S. Marine decorated for his participation in the war in Iraq is challenging anti-gay policy in the U.S. armed forces, go to the next link http://news .aol.com/topnews/articles/_a/dont-ask-dont-tell-revisited/20070228124709990001? ncid = NWS00010000000001 or equivalent link http://tinyurl.com/2ksozc Tinyurl

to the Motherland of Judeo-Christian homophobia, the very Israel, and does not criminalize homosexuality, or even on its military.

According to the web site http://www.gaymilitary.ucsb.edu/PressCenter/press_rel12.htm :

"... A study entitled" Homosexuality and The Israeli military Furezas': Did the Survey the Gay Ban Undermine the Military Operation? Written by Aaron Belkin, Director for the Center for the Study of Sexual Minorities in the Military Forces of the University of California at Santa Barbara and Melissa Levitt, Associate Professor of Political Science at San Francisco State University.

... None of the 23 nations that allow gay soldiers to serve openly have reported problems ...

... opponents (U.S.) of gays and lesbians in the military say they are irelevantes foreign experiences to determine what would happen if the U.S. lifted its ban, even where it is legal, many homosexuals out of the closet now in units of fighting in foreign armies. (But) As Belkin and Levit, however, known gays serve in combat units of the Israel Defense Forces. They surveyed 136 Israeli combat soldiers and found that 17% knew a homosexual partner in your unit.

Based on interviews with 35 academic experts and officials and a review of 259 government documents and news articles, Belkin and Levitt found no evidence that openly gay soldiers sovacaron military operation, cohesion or morale. Prof. Stuart Cohen, a senior military expert at the Center for Strategic Studies at Bar-Ilan University, told Belkin and Levitt that "homosexuals are not an issue (of conflict) the cohesion of units in the Defence Forces Israel. Indeed, the whole thing is a very marginal to what these armed forces are concerned.

Next, opponents of gay and lesbians in the military say that foreign experiences are irelevantes as gays and lesbians receive special treatment in foreign forces overseas. Based on his Interview in and review of literature, Belkin and Levitt found that despite the lack of perfectly equal treatment in all cases, the majority of the Israeli gay and lesbian soldiers are treated the same as their heterosexual peers most of the time. And, they found no evidence that rare cases of different treatment impaired functioning, cohesion or morale.

Finally, opponents of homosexuals in the military say they are foreign Experiences irelevantes given the uniqueness of American culture culture as well as the United States military. Belkin and Levitt argue that all national cultures are unique. Dadoi that 23 countries have lifted their bans against homosexuality successfully, cultural differences do not seem to determine whether the lifting of bans anti-homoseuxales undermine the military. According

Nathaniel Frank, Director of Communications Center for the Study of Sexual Minorities in the Military, "It has been 27 years since the Dutch army was the first to lift its ban against homosexuals and 22 other countries have followed suit in consequential years. If opponents of gay men and lesbians in the military really believe that undermine the military uprising, why not have produced studies showing that this is the case? "

What had become of the glory that was Greece and the power that was ancient Rome if armies had forbidden his most famous victory and overall such as Alexander the Great and Julius Caesar, among others, being part of the conquest campaigns merely for being gay and bisexual?

Answer: Not so glorious or so powerful.

I think the Pentagon is a hostelling of homophobic, interesting, and ironically, according to scientific studies related to human behavior and mental health indicate that a high percentage of homophobic are actually repressed homosexuals, an issue on which I will elaborate shortly.

Laura Gemser Emanuelle Movie Online

butt homophobes

VII.

Note: Future comments on this blog will relate to gay marriages, adoption and parenting skills of children by gay parents supported by scientific studies and their official statements by professional mental health organizations to As comments on homosexuality in Puerto Rico.

Next, an example of the erroneous interpretation of the words of St. Paul, who claim to champion favorite ban God and the sinfulness of homosexuality. This misunderstanding must be fought to stop the lies and falsehood continue to be used to repress the collective soul of the GLBT community to fight the malicious attempts to prevent the development of gay spirituality and attempts to separate the community GLBT of the Creator who loves them as He created Mismmo.

Many who like to quote biblical passages to argue that homosexuality is a sin, those who quote the words of St. Paul in his letter to the Romans, almost always get two sentences out of context of the issue and begin the full letter appointments with verse 26 and older who says

"... 26 For this reason God gave them up to degrading passions: for their women exchanged natural relations for unnatural relations. 27 Likewise also the men abandoned natural relations with women, burned in their lust with each other, committing shameful acts, men with men and receiving in themselves the penalty corresponding to its Lost .. .

If you start reading from verse 22, it becomes very clear that Paul was speaking of those who committed the sin of idolatry and PUNISHMENT be converted in gay men and lesbians by God for practice Idolatry .

According to Romans 1:22 - 25: "... 22 Professing to be wise they became fools, 23 And changed the glory of the incorruptible God into an IMAGE (IDOLATRAIA) to likeness of corruptible man of birds and animals, and reptiles. 24 SO God gave them up to uncleanness, in the passions of their hearts, to dishonor their bodies among Yes 25 They exchanged the truth of God into a lie, and revered and worshiped the creation (Idolatry) rather than the Creator, who is blessed forever! Amen ... "

Paul's words NO say that homosexuality is a sin, but sin that is Idolatry and the Homosexuality is punishment given by God eat is made clear in the words of the verses 26 and 27:

"... Therefore, God gave them over to shameful lusts ( homosexuality), for even their women exchanged the natural use into that which is against nature." 27 - "And likewise also the men abandoned the natural use of the woman, burned in their lust one toward another, men committing shameless acts with men and receiving in themselves the due penalty for their perversion. "

Interestingly, for thousands of years must have been countless same-sex couples viviron all their stocks deliriously happy in ancient cultures where homosexuality was acceptable without being happen that homosexuality was what Paul considered a punishment from God. What Paul presumed not to let the gay community speak for themselves.

are so many "tablibanes" homophobic fundamentalist Christians who can not read the ancient Hebrew resulting in the Bible do not know that the word "men" in the little phrase "all men of the city" that appears in the biblical the destruction of two cities does not specifically refer to all male citizens , but the Hebrew word "Am" means "people" or "nation" (as we say "all people") A people, including people or nation, both men and women like children. With email communications, Rabbi Gershon Caudill explained that the paabra "Am" refers to a group composed of related individuals.

Jewish Rabbi Gershon Caudill, of course, can read, write and speak Hebrew, he said the following (which expressed slightly above) when he asked about the little phrase "all men of Sodom wanted to rape the two angels, Lot's guests.

"... The Hebrew word 'Am means" the people, "or" the nation. "A people or a nation includes Both Men and Women as well as Boy and Girl Children. The word Actually Refers to a group That Is related to Each Other, Kinsmen ... "

THEREFORE, it is a mistake to translate the Hebrew word "Am" and "men" in the sense of beings as exclusively male homophobes so many Christians insist on their ignorance to color the story as if it were an exclusively homosexual rape, attempted ciudanos by all men of Sodom when the reality is that involving a group of men and women where the act of rape was not for the sexual gratification of the rapists, but to humiliate the manhood of the two foreigners hiding in the house of Lot. The rape of warriors defeated by the victorious enemy warriors was common in antiquity was not necessarily for sexual pleasure but for the sake of having power over a defeated enemy. The

delight homophobic fundamentalist Christians quoting the words of Paul in 1 Corinthians 6:9-10:

"... 9 Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor homosexuals , 10 nor thieves, nor covetous, nor drunkards, nor slanderers nor swindlers will inherit the kingdom of God ... "

Note: Some Bibles, the word "gay" in the quote above is replaced by the word "sodomites."

Ignorance of both homophobic religious painting in the ancient languages \u200b\u200bof the Bible can be seen when they quote the words of Paul in 1 Corinthians 6:9-10 to which I respond with the following quote from a source that obviously very familiar with the vocabulary of biblical Greek and writes in a very polite Castilian:

http://www.cristianshomosexuals.org/castella/documentos/nuevotestamento.htm # corintis

"... Paul in I Corinthians 6: 9-10 and I Timothy 1: 9-10 provides two lists of sins in I Corinthians are those who are excluded from the kingdom, and in I Timothy those who have not received the law of God, in both lists of sins modern translators identify homosexuality. Ichor terms appear in Greek and Arsenokoitai malakoi, and in I Timothy appear only Arsenokoitai: The current translators translate them with a variety of terms ranging from "sodomites" to "child molesters" to "effeminate", "inverted", "prostitutes", "practicing homosexuals" among others. try to bring some order.

word malakos 1 is very common Greek and basically means "soft, weak, weak." In the New Testament appears frequently in the sense of "weak, weak, sick" in a context of moral issue would mean "licentious, profligate, dissolute." It is free to assume that this notion is expressed or exclusively relate to gay people. In fact, in Greek this word was not used to refer to homosexuality. The rooted tradition since Thomas Aquinas is to understand this word 2 in connection with masturbation, this idea has come up well into the twentieth century through Protestant translations. In the most recent translations, since very few moralists believe that masturbation be cause for exclusion in the Kingdom of God so harsh sentence has been moved to a less frequent sexual activity and less accepted socialmente3. The interpretation that currently seems most correct is that designates malakoi immorality, laziness ethics in general.

arsenokoítes4 The term is very strange in Greek, the two primerasocasiones in which they appear are precisely the two quotations from the New Testament that we are dealing, then appears in the Greek patristic. But it is none of the terms that the ancient Greek language used to refer to homosexual practices: first there was a generic term for homosexuality or homosexuals, remember this word came up in the s. XIX (yes had for some practices). Boswell and McNeill believe that originally the term refers to male prostitution, this interpretation is reinforced by the context of the Old Testament, which was associated with certain forms of prostitution in pagan idolatrous worship. Helminiak provides an updated explanation: The Hebrew language has no word to express the idea of \u200b\u200bhomosexuality in a generic sense, the Hebrew expression miƒkav zaxúr served to refer to the synagogue to ban teaching of Leviticus 18: and 20:13, when The rabbis taught or preached in Greek Greek using a tracing built on the above Hebrew expression: arsenokoites: koi-Greek root corresponds to the Hebrew ƒkb-both in the sense of "lie, have sex," and the Greek root arsen-corresponds to the Hebrew zaxur "male, male ";" is a suffix tes5 built male agent name, so that the word is characterized as masculine. If Jesus and the early Christian communities abolished the ritual purity of the Jewish Law, one may wonder why it appears in these letters, apparently is a blatant contradiction. What did the century moralists I dc. When did negative assessments of homosexuality? Thinking in adults copulating with preteens, thinking in children and teenagers kidnapped for the slave trade and for sale and often into prostitution, for that reason it is not necessary to mention the lesbianism, which does not lead to similar abuse. When we today in the s. XX comes to homosexuality we refer to a normal variation of sexual orientation and emotional tipping genitally some people to adults of the same sex, is a definitive and irreversible6 variant. We therefore conclude that Arsenokoitai refers to a type of abusive or exploitative sex. In fact, if he had wanted to describe homosexuality as intrinsically evil, should also make reference to female homosexuality.

1 In I Corinthians 6: 9-10 appears in the plural: malakoí2 mollitia.3 In Latin mollicies or look at how the change in translation is not based on new data or philological exegesis, but a change in attitude on sexual morality 4 In I Corinthians 6: 9-10 i I Timothy 1: 9-10 appears in the plural: arsenokoitai. 5-TES tai singular and plural. 6 In this regard can be found MONDIMORE recent writings as a natural history of homosexuality, Barcelona 1998, editorial Polity Press (original edition Baltimore and London 1996) where they are listed the latest scientific research on homosexuality explained in language accessible to nonspecialists , and How SORIANO live RUBIO Homosexuality and lesbianism, Salamanca 1999, editions Amaru, which is investigated mainly from the psychological point of view, the work is updated and accessible to non-specialists ... "

There are many who cite the words of St. Paul as a guide innerante biblical what they wrongly claim are their views condemning homosexuality but ignore Paul's words about slavery and his words that forbid women to speak and teach in religious congregations. Remember that Paul began his biblical role as mass murderer when persecuted and killed Christians.

But the nonsense of Paul are not limited to the above since Paul also believed to favor of slavery when Timothy instructs the runaway slave, Onesimus, who returns to his master, Philemon, and humbly obey him.

Also, the letter of Paul to the Ephesians 6:5-8, Paul instructs slaves (the word servant in the Greek era slave doulas) to obey their amoscomo Jesus: "... 5 Servants, be obedient to those who are your masters on earth contemor and trembling, in sincerity of heart, as unto Christ, 6 not serving only when you're watching, and those who want to get along with men, but as servants of Christ, doing the will of God with courage. 7 Serve wholeheartedly, as the Lord, not men, 8 knowing that good to do each, that will receive from the Lord, whether slave or free ... "

This same Paul ruled that women had to wear a veil and could not talk for a religious congregation as shown in 1 Corinthians 14: 34 "... women keep silent in the congregations , because not allowed to talk , but are subject, as well as what the law says. 35 If you want to learn about something, ask at home to their own husbands, because the woman is inappropriate to speak at the Congregation ... "

Also, Paul says in 1 Timothy 2: " .. .11 Women learn in silence with all subjection; 12 because permit no woman to teach or exercise authority over man, but to be in Silent io ... "

it is interesting that so many ministers, reverends, preachers and pastors Paul cited both in relation to what they imagine to be speaking out against homosexuality but he ignored their instructions that women do not have to speak or teach in congregations and climb to pulpits of congregations to preach and exercise some control over the men in their congregations.

doñas These same leading congregations and preaching remind other Paul's instructions to women in 2 Timothy 2:9-10: "... 9 also that women adorn themselves in decent clothing, with modesty and prudence, not with braided hair or gold or pearls or expensive clothes ... "

I have seen several of these preachers on television programs doñas climbs in high heels, makeup smeared over the pig of Juan Bobo, with hair braided hair tinted with gold and pearls Alajar and expensive clothes. That are comfortable to throw frogs and snakes against the homosexual community, supposedly quoting Paul while ignoring Paul's instructions related to braided hair and gold jewelry and pearls.

Anyway, as I did not recognize any moral authority to give instructions Pablo social behavior, either, accept their sanctimoniousness related to clothing and adornment of women.

Another thing that many homophobic religious pint repeated ad nauseam is that Paul says that all scripture is inspired by God and, therefore, all the disparate views of Paul are the word of God divine inspiration.

Let me amend that presumption to anoint themselves as spokespersons of the word of God by way of Paul's words. When Paul said that all scripture was inspired by God, he was referring to the Old Testament, because when he said those words, the New Testament had not yet been written.

is interesting that Paul speaks but does not identify something which he refieria as a "thorn in the flesh or eguijón" what and why he begged God to take it off unsuccessfully in 2 Corinthians 12: 7 -9: "12:7 ... And for the greatness of the revelations keep me from exalting, I was given a thorn in my flesh, a messenger of Satan to buffet me, lest I be exalted; 12: 8 in which three different times I begged the Lord to take it away from me. 12:9 And he says: My grace is sufficient for my power is made perfect in weakness. Therefore most gladly I will rather boast in my weaknesses, so that it rests upon me the power of Christ ... "
Considering
like attitude of Paul toward women and sexual prudery," could have been that homosexuality itself sting?

Obviously, someone like Paul who did not condemn the slavery, which had serious prejudices related to gender and women is not a person to whom you can be considered as a credible source of moral authority.

But Paul was not the only one to have crazy ideas about sex, morals and social order. Some religious ridiculeses some can be read at the following site Cyberspace:

http://www.pastornet.net.au/jmm/articles/2105.htm Canto

Petrus (died 1197) believed that having sex with a beautiful woman was a greater sin than with an ugly, because it gave more delight.

St. Thomas Aquinas believed that deviate from the missionary position was worse than relacionessexuales to hold one's own mother.

For those who do not know, the missionary position is the sexual position where the man is lying on top of the woman looking down while she is under the man looking up tothe legs open. For many Christians this is the only decent position Cristiano and heterosexual sex Any deviation from this position is a sexual perversion. Until that arrives

despotism of some Christian fanatics. Unbelievable.

Santa Bernadina of Siena (d. 1440) said that if a woman knows her husband is going to practice coitus interruptus, she has to "resist her husband until death."

Theodore of Tarsus became the penalty for oral sex in penance for life for premeditated murder but solamene seven years.

Christmas Sleigh Cake

VI.

Against Nature?

For nearly two thousand years the "ayatollahs" Christians have been repeating the phrase that super-duper vaunted homosexuality is "unnatural," that is, that because the alleged homosexuality not exist in the animal kingdom, then, human homosexuality is against the laws of nature established by God.

In his book of 751 pages Biological Exuberance: Animal Homosexuality and Natural Diversity , which was nominated for the Pulitzer Prize in 1999, biologist, Bruce Bagemihl, sweeps the above homophobic chorus throughout the animal kingdom 200 years of documented scientific observation in which the animal homosexuality manifests itself from insects, reptiles, birds and mammals including the most intelligent as primates and dolphins. View http://www.borngayprocon.org/pop/specieslist.htm .

A species of mountain sheep, the Bighorn Sheep United States, live in sexually segregated herds most of the year except for a short period during which females are in estrus when males approach females for mating. The rest of the year the males live in herds composed exclusively of males where homosexuality is norma.Ver http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2004/03/040309073256.htm.

For those religious fundamentalists who are so fond of citing the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah for the wrath of God for the alleged practice of homosexuality, it seems that the same God created a kind of lizard that is only females that reproduce by the mutual gentital-genital stimulation resulting in that all the eggs hatch in female lizards lésbicas.Ver http://www.nerve.com/Regulars/ScienceOfSex/09-19-00/09 -19-00.asp .

The day will come when the Church itself will have to give explanation to the throne of God for their persecution and spiritual terrorism through the centuries that resulted in incarceration, torutura and death of hundreds of thousands of men and women of the gay community.

hope that the information in this blog to which supplements will be added periodically, they serve the GLBT community of weapons to combat the lies of the modern Pharisees that violate the human rights of the GLBT community.

NOTE: Being new to the format to edit this blog, please be patient while I learn how to make links to sites on the internet to work within it. Added

, Sunday, March 4, 2007.

Next, a link to a video narrated in English about 6 minutes long to film evidence of the practice of homsexualidad between animals in which, surely, will be of particular interest to those who deny the existence homophobic of homosexuality in the animal kingdom, there is a scene where two females hold bononos lesbian sex with their young in the arm.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8VSDVRuPydk

To the delight of all homophobic, especially the ignorant religious painting are eternally the fracesita crowing that homosexuality is "unnatural "and that does not exist in the animal kingdom by design of God's will to ensure the propagation of the species, which probably have been anononados after witnessing a number of animal specimens holding homosexual sex in the video above, to follow a link opens a list of several other videos show irrefutable evidence of the practice of homosexuality in the animal kingdom.

http://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=animal+homosexuality&search=Search

With the evidence above, we see another column collapse homophobes crazy believed supported his premise that human homosexuality is an erroneous statement in violation of the Divine Will, and especially its assumption that human homosexuality is "unnatural" to go against the laws of nature alegadadas in which there is homosexuality in the animal kingdom.

Nothing, absolutely nothing that some homophobic can cite scripture one can deny the truth of the facts and scientific observations documented not only in literature but also in photographs and films of animal homosexual activity in the wild and in captivity, therefore, is completely destroyed the false claim that homosexuality is unnatural because homosexuality is widely practiced throughout the animal kingdom on the whole face of the planet from insects, reptiles, birds and mammals.

From page 134 of the book by biologist Bruce Bagemihl, Ph.D., Biological Exuberance: Animal Homosexuality and Natural Diversity the following:

"... One of the most prevalent myths about animal homosexuality is that it is invariably caused by a lack of members of the opposite sex. This percentage is typically attributed to reasons out of whack in the population (more males than females, or vice versa), or not having the opposite sex miebros available due to segregation, hostility or indifference from potential partners, or other factors . This belief is widely held by non-scientists (nonscientists) and, also, is the "explanation" more common than biologists have been proposed for the occurrence of homosexuality in animals ...

... The line of reasoning in "expliaciones" such as it is curious because it implies that if there is an adequate supply of the opposite sex, then, homosexuality will inevitably arise. This is actually an unintended statement of the relative strength of homosexual desire, or correspondingly, the relative weakness of heterosexual imperative - is really, really, very faint if these factors are capable of Desperate balance. In addition, the lack of members of the opposite sex - what we call the assumption of scarcity (shortge hypothesis) - is simply incompatible with the data ...

... The scarcity hypothesis can not be a universal explanation of animal homosexuality because of the many examples of animals homosexual activity holding even when members of the opposite sex are freely available. [35] *

* [35] For explicit rejection of (and Evidence Against) the hypothesis Shortage by zoologists Studying Various animal homosexuality, see Translation: For an explicit rejection of (and evidence against) the assumption of scarcity see) Gorilla (Harcourt et al. 1981:276); Japanense Macaque (Fedigan and Gouzoules 1978:494; Vasey 1996:550, 1998:17) Rhesus Monkey (Akers and Conaway 1979:77 ), Flamingo (King 1994:107), Common Gull (Riddiford 1995:112), Jackdaw (Roel 1978:103), Galah (Reogers and McCulloch 1981:90; Rowley 1990:59-60).

In orangutans, gulls Japanese macaques tucos, Rhesus macaque, common gulls, black headed gulls, penguins King, Galahs, and about 40 species, scientists have documented individuals ignoring potential partners of the opposite sex and looking, instead, same-sex couples , homosexual activity or heterosexual activity concurrently with (ie even when potential partners of the opposite sex are available, as already mentioned in the discussion of bisexuality animal) [36]. In fact, in a surprising number of species, homosexual activity is positively correlated with heterosexual activity: interactions of the same sex is now increasing as the animals gain access to opposite-sex partners and reduced in their absence. This is exactly the opposite of what would be expected if homosexuality results from a lack of access to opportunities for heterosexual intercourse ... "

Mikuni 32mmcarburation Snowmobile

David and Jonathan dancing a tango

Part V.
Gay Lovers in the Bible

Prince Jonathan, son King Saul and David, the future king of Israel, were lovers as evidenced by the alleged "innerante" Bible in several passages, especially of a specific passage that quoted the words of David according to the book of 2 Samuel said later.

The beginning of a love between two young warriors is told in 1 Samuel 18: 1-4:

"... 1 to pass, when David finished speaking to Saul, the soul of Jonathan was knit to of David and Jonathan loved him as himself. 2 One Day Saul retained and not let him return to his father's house. 3 Then Jonathan made a covenant with David, because she loved him as himself . 4 And Jonathan took off the robe she was wearing and gave it to David, along with his other clothes, including his sword, his bow and his belt ... "

The quote above tells how the prince fell in love with David Jonathan at first glance and listen to the voice of David for the first time describing their participation in the bloody war against the Canaanites (romantiquísimo topic). While the religious homophobes want to ignore, that a man was "link" your soul another man's soul and to love him as yourself instantly with the first meeting between the two, is an obvious indicator of a strong attraction homoerotic nature.

Interestingly, 2. Samuel 20 says

"... 30 And Jonathan Saul was enraged and said: - Son of the corrupt and rebellious! Do not you know that you've chosen the son of Jesse, and yours to shame shame of the nakedness of your mother ? "

The scene above has been repeated millions of times over the millennia when a homophobic father learns that his son is a homosexual relationship and blames the mother. Nothing new under the sun.

phrase or fulanilla fulanillo nudity as such in the Bible always has sexual connotations (see next paragraph of Leviticus), therefore, why does Saul sexual reference to her son, Jonathan, has chosen David as his close friend?

Leviticus 18 "... 6" No man approaching a woman who is his close relatives to uncover her nakedness . I am the LORD. 7 " not uncover the nakedness of your father or your mother's nakedness . She is your mother not uncover her nakedness. 8" not uncover the nakedness of your father's wife. Is your father's nakedness. 9 not uncover the nakedness of your sister , daughter of your father or your mother's daughter, born at home or born outside it. 10 " not uncover the nakedness of your daughter son or daughter of your daughter, because their nakedness is your own nakedness . 11 " not uncover the nakedness of the daughter of the wife of your father, your father was the father. She's your sister. 12" No discover the nakedness of thy father's sister . She is your father's close relative. 13 "You shall not uncover the nakedness your mother's sister. She is your mother's close relative. 14" not uncover the nakedness of your father's brother . Do not go to his wife. She's your aunt. 15 "You shall not uncover the nakedness of thy daughter. She is the wife of your son. not uncover her nakedness. 16" You shall not uncover the nakedness of your brother's wife . It the nakedness of your brother . 17 "No discover the nakedness of a woman and her daughter . Thou Shalt Not Take the daughter of his son or daughter of his daughter to uncover her nakedness . They are close relatives. That is an outrage. 18" No take a wife to her sister, to vex her, to uncover her nakedness while it alive. 19 "Do not approach a woman during her uncleanness to uncover her nakedness ..."

of the same mouth of David leaves his public confession to be read from the same Bible used many times to hit the gay community that for him the love of Jonathan's love exceeded
women
2 Samuel 1: "... 26" Anguish I have for you, my brother, Jonathan, you were very dear to me. More was wonderful for me your love the love of women ... "

Again" ... More was wonderful for me your love than the love of women ... "

Of course, it is expected that pint homophobic religious protest and say that word "brother" in the Biblical quote above "proof" that the love between Jonathan and David was love between brothers and nonsexual, however, who have knowledge of flowery style language used in Biblical texts know that the words " brother "and" sister " were terms used in poetry and literature of the ancient Egyptians and Hebrews as synonymous with" lover "and" beloved (a) in the sense romantic and sexual as can be seen in the following passage:

Songs, Chapter 4:9

"... 9 ravished my heart, oh My sister and girlfriend ! Ravished my heart with a single gesture of your eyes, with one account of your necklace. 10 How sweet is your touch , oh My sister and girlfriend ! Your touch is better than wine. The smell of your perfume is higher than the spices. 11 Your lips drop honey and honeycomb. My girlfriend Oh, honey and milk are under your tongue ... "

Well, there you have it, King Soloman, alleged author of the song quoted above meowing like a cat in heat amorasamente of incestuous inclination toward his sister , which calls its "girlfriend" and under whose tongue found honey and milk.

seems that these ancient Hebrews had a strong attachment to incest because the Bible tells us that Abraham's wife, Sara, was his half sister, the daughter of his father and Lot, the nephew of Abraham, was given tremendous binge came with her two daughters in a cave shortly after the destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah and fathered two illegitimate children with his daughters, among other instances in the Bible of incestuous enjoyed, especially by the leaders and royalty of the ancient Hebrews. That old gang of green and, supposedly, "holy men." Please.

According to the book of Exodus, a man named Amran, married his aunt by the father and the incestuous relationship resulted in the birth of no less than Moses and Aaron. That familita is that of Abraham. By what moral authority? I wonder ... for whatever ...? That "traditional family values" of these ancient Hebrews.

Finger Pain When Urinating

Part IV.
temporarily detour I
the subject of the origins of homophobia for comment on the issue of marriage between same-sex couples in Puerto Rico.

FOR NOW, Puerto Rico, the state does not recognize and therefore does not issue marriage licenses to couples of the same genus because the Puerto Rican legislature has not passed any law that recognizes marriage between persons of the same genus for fear of losing the votes of people who are predominantly homophobic because of the cultural heritage of traditional religion which maintains its position that the practice of homosexuality is a sin.

However, wedding ceremonies between members of the same gender can not prohibit anyone in Puerto Rico.

If a couple of the same gender would not want outsiders try to interfere in important decisions of their life together in the event of serious illness and death if they can sign a legal document in which mutual heirs and representatives declare mutual if any of them can not fend for themselves physically and mentally.

have been cases where a family member of a same gender couple who died are left with all incleyendo the house and money in bank accounts, leaving the widowed partner @ in the street.

gay marriages already are a reality in Spain, Holland and other European Union nations are the countries with the highest levels of quality of life on the planet yet better than in the United States.

Although the vast majority of people in Puerto Rico are still sexist and homophobic mentality, there is a growing sector of our country that has been illuminating with respect to the human rights of the GLBT community through new scientific information related to viewing homosexuality and social events in other countries and that is the lighted sector must educate others so that the day comes that Puerto Rico will join the other civilized countries and leave behind their collective mentality savage homophobic share some Third World countries ruled by theocracies homophobic.

When Spain legalized marriage between same-sex couples, the Ayatollahs yard Christians rioted and began to climb into account stage, radio and television forum and pulpit had to reach to throw their poison loaded with homophobic hate the four corners of the building learns about God's original intentions have created male and female beings and the need to protect the institution of the family against the dangers of legalizing gay marriage ..

Little did these fools believe that experts in the interpretation of sacred texts without knowing how to read, write and speak the original languages \u200b\u200bof the Bible that gay marriage rites within the church Christian is nothing new.


Ironically, the words that are often part of religious ceremonies of marriage between a man and a woman are drawn from the Bible and were said by one woman to another woman.


Read Ruth 1: 16-17: "... Do not urge me to leave you or me except you, because wherever you go I will go, and where you lodge, I will live. Your people shall be my people and thy God my God. 17 Where you die I will die, and there will be buried. It makes me Lord and I still add that only the death part you and I ... "

Según evidencia epigráfica: Las Antiguas Iglesias Casaban Homosexuales

El "link" cibernético http://www.geocities.com/pharsea/tradition.html#more%20in%20spirit%20than%20in%20flesh provee una traducción al inglés del original griego de un antiguo rito de la Iglesia Ortodoxa del siglo 13 para la unión de una pareja del mismo género conocido como el texto de Sinai 966 (mi traducción del inglés):


"SINAI 966 " [Siglo XIII: Greigo]


Aquellos con intenciones de ser unidos vendrán ante el sacerdote. Pondrá su mano about the gospel and the second on the first hand.
Lord our God and ruler who commissioned the union of the holy martyrs Serge and Bacchus: concedles to these your servants grace to love each other and share without hate and not the cause of scandal all the days of their lives. Concedles
fidelity without shame, true love.
now Accept these your servants N and N to be united in spirit and faith to flourish in virtue and justice and love sincere.
them be joined together more in spirit than in the flesh. And they shall kiss the Holy Gospel and each other and will be closed.
This liturgy is particularly important for his sentence to two men are united, "more spirit than flesh ."... This request is exactly what one would expect if the liturgy was a celebration of sexual union among Christians, for whom the union body is important But still spiritual union ... "
epigraphic and archaeological evidence: Same-Sex Burials Byzantine Church complimentaries
The following is what I wrote above regarding the liturgy rites of same-sex unions in the Byzantine Catholic and Orthodox churches. The difference is that The following information resulting from an archaeological exavación provides evidence of the physical existence of same-sex couples which very well could have been joined by similar rites to those reported in the text of Sinai 966.
translated the information below from the following site cyberspace.

http://www.depts.drew.edu/jhc/samesex.html "Burials in Greek Macedonia: Possible Evidence for Committed Same-Sex Relationships in Ancient Christianity by Valerie Abrahamsen.

Burials of pairs of men and women in contexts pairs ecclesiastico early Byzantine era ... were found in excavations in Felippi and Edessa in northern Greece ...

and Edessa in Felippi Primary evidence same-sex union of Byzantine period is archaeological and epigraphic.

sleeping place belonging to Posidonia, dean and Pancaria, very humble canoness. Fourth to fifth century. Marble stele Felippi eastern side ... Place
Euodiana sleeping and Dorothea. Fifth century. Outside of the Basilica. Sleeping
Alexandra Place and Glukeria (or Glukerios). Fifth to sixth century. Basilica B.
place to sleep for the very principles Priests, Faustino and Donatos, holy catholic and apostolic church of the Felipenses. Fourth century.
place to sleep for the very dovotos Priests, Konstantios Gourasios and resting in Christ, 14 indiction. Fourth to sixth century. Place
Kyriakos and Nikandra sleep (or Nikandros or Nikanor). Fourth to fifth century ... "proverbial
the very stones are speaking as a witness a former reality that today some deny and try to stifle and hide.
John 8:32:" ... and know the truth, and truth will set you free ... "

Kate Playground Topless

Part IV.
temporarily detour I
the subject of the origins of homophobia to comment on the subject of marriage between same-sex couples in Puerto Rico.

FOR NOW, Puerto Rico, the state does not recognize and therefore does not issue marriage licenses to couples of the same genus because the Puerto Rican legislature has not passed any law that recognizes marriage between persons of the same gender for fear of losing the votes of people who are predominantly homophobic because of the cultural heritage of traditional religion which maintains its position that the practice of homosexuality is a sin .

However, wedding ceremonies between members of the same gender can not prohibit anyone in Puerto Rico.

If a same-sex couples would not want outsiders trying to interfere in important decisions of their life together in the event of serious illness and death if they can sign a legal document in which mutual heirs and representatives declare mutual if any of them can not use for yourself physically and mentally.

have been cases where a family member of a same gender couple who died are left with all incleyendo the house and money in bank accounts, leaving the widowed partner @ in the street.

gay marriages already are a reality in Spain, Holland and other European Union nations are the countries with the highest levels of quality of life on the planet even better than in the United States.

Although the vast majority of people in Puerto Rico are still sexist and homophobic mentality, there is a growing sector of our country that has been illuminating with respect to the human rights of the GLBT community through new scientific information related to homosexuality and seeing social events in other countries and that is the lighted sector must educate others so that the day comes that Puerto Rico will join the other civilized countries and leaves behind his collective mentality savage homophobic share some Third World countries ruled by theocracies homophobic.

When Spain legalized marriage between same-sex couples, the Ayatollahs yard Christians rioted and began to climb into account stage, radio and television forum and pulpit had at its disposal to spew their venom laden with homophobic hate the four points cardinal of all creation on God's original intentions have created male and female beings and the need to protect the institution of the family against the dangers of legalizing gay marriage ..

Little did these fools believe that experts in the interpretation of sacred texts without knowing how to read, write and speak the original languages \u200b\u200bof the Bible that gay marriage rites in the Christian church are nothing new.

Ironically, the words that are often part of religious ceremonies of marriage between a man and a woman are drawn from the Bible and were said by one woman to another woman. Lean

Ruth 1: 16-17: "... Do not urge me to leave you or me except you, because wherever you go I will go, and where you lodge, I will live. Your people shall be my people, and your God my God. 17 Where you die I will die, and there will be buried. It makes me Lord and I still add that only the death part you and I ... "

According epigraphic evidence: The Old Churches
Gay married
The "link" cyber http://www.geocities.com/pharsea/tradition.html # more% 20in% 20spirit% 20in% 20than% 20flesh provides original English translation of an ancient Greek Orthodox Church rite of the 13 th century to the union of a same-genre known as the text of Sinai 966 (my translation from English):

"SINAI 966" [XIII Century: Greig]

Those intending to be joined come before the priest. Lay his hand on the gospel and the second on the first hand.

Lord our God and ruler who commissioned the union of the holy martyrs Serge and Bacchus: concedles to these your servants grace to love each other and share without hate and not be cause of scandal all the days of their lives.

Concedles fidelity without shame, true love.

now Accept these your servants N and N to be united in spirit and faith to flourish in virtue and justice and love sincere.

them be joined together more in spirit than in the flesh. And they shall kiss the Holy Gospel and each other and will be closed.

This liturgy is particularly important for his sentence to two men are united "more in spirit than in the flesh." ... This request is exactly what one would expect if the liturgy was a celebration sexual union among Christians, for whom physical union
important spiritual union But still ... "

epigraphic and archaeological evidence: Same-Sex Burials Byzantine Church

complimentaries The following is what I wrote above regarding the liturgy rites of same-sex unions in the Byzantine Catholic and Orthodox churches. The difference is that the following information resulting from an archaeological exavación provides evidence of the physical existence of couples same sex which may well have been joined by similar rites to those reported in the text of Sinai 966.

translated the information below from the following site cyberspace.

http://depts.drew.edu/jhc/samesex.html " Burials in Greek Macedonia: Possible Evidence for Committed Same-Sex Relationships in Ancient Christianity by Valerie Abrahamsen.

Burials of pairs of men and women in contexts pairs ecclesiastico early Byzantine era ... were found in excavations in Felippi and Edessa in northern Greece ...

In Felippi and Edessa primary evidence of same-sex unions Byzantine period is archaeological and epigraphic.

sleeping place belonging to Posidonia, dean and Pancaria, very humble canoness. Fourth to fifth century. Marble stele Felippi eastern side ...

Euodiana place to sleep and Dorothea. Fifth century. Outside of the Basilica.

Alexandra Place and Glukeria sleep (or Glukerios). Fifth to sixth century. Basilica B. Place

sleeping very principles of Priests, Faustino and Donatos, holy catholic and apostolic church of the Felipenses. Fourth century. Place

sleeping on the very dovotos Priests, and Konstantios Gourasios, resting in Christ, 14 indiction. Fourth to sixth century.

Kyriakos place to sleep and Nikandra (or Nikandros or Nikanor). Fourth to fifth century ... "

proverbial The very stones are speaking as a witness a former reality that today some deny and try to stifle and hide.

John 8:32: " ... know the truth and the truth shall make you free ... "

Rubbermaid Outlet, Ontario, Canada

Pharisee belching fire and brimstone homophobic

Part III.

The Lie of Sodom and Gomorrah

For those who delight them both cite passages to condemn homosexuality and consequently rationalize their homophobia with Divine approval, the same Bible verses can be made bouncing against their homophobic prejudices.

As we all know, the pint homophobic religious bigots have been from time immemorial crowing the same song that the sin of homosexuality was the reason God destroyed Sodom and Gomorrah, however, the Bible itself in the book Ezekiel gives us a list of reasons and SURPRISE! homosexuality is not on the happy list.

Ezekiel 16: "... 49 Behold, this was the iniquity of your sister Sodom: Pride, plenty of bread and carefree tranquility had she and her daughters. But she did not hand the poor and needy . 50 They were haughty and committed abomination before Me, so that when I saw the deleted it. .. "

Note that NO no mention of homosexuality in above list, but a mere mention of a remote and abomination that did not require any specific identification and at the end of the list when it would be logical if the sin for which the two cities were destroyed had been homosexuality, then homosexuality would been placed at the top of the list and unequivocally identified.

As I said before, the sky caya Bible written in English, but it was written in Hebrew, Aramaic and ancient Greek, to follow a malicious and wrong translation from Hebrew to English homophobic is exposed.

Deuteronomy 23:17 says: "... It has whore of the daughters of Israel, nor a sodomite of the sons of Israel ...

" The original Hebrew says "... i, lo'-thihyeh qedhêshâh Israel velo'-YiHYeH mibbenoth qâdhêshm ibbenêy Israel ... "

Note the words" whore "and" sodomite " in the English version were translated from the Hebrew words " qedhêshâh "and" qâdhêshm " that are the same word in male and female forms that meant "prostitute (I) sacred (I)" of a pagan temple.
Note also that the word S'dom, Hebrew for Sodom, it appears in the Hebrew bible quoted above, then what was the reason to translate the Hebrew word "qâdhêshm" as "Sodomite?"

The reason was the homophobia of the translators.

For an extended and detailed explanation in English of the quotation from Deuteronomy 23:17, see http://diarios.aol.com/_do/% 3CA% 20href = .

Full Hysterectomy And Menopause And Sleeplessness

Part II.

The Bible did not fall from heaven written in Castilian, covered in Moroccan leather, with the edges of pages gilded with gold leaf 24 carat and endorsed with the seal and imprimatur of the Holy Inquisition or a shared dedication to painting because homophobic religious fundamentalist who scored his credentials as minister, pastor, reverend or priest of a box of corn flakes who can not read, write or speak in the original languages \u200b\u200bof the Bible, Hebrew, Aramaic and Greek and depend on mistranslations that always result in erroneous interpretations.

Next, educated opinion regarding the mention of homosexuality in the Bible of a rabbi as a child was taught to read, write and speak the ancient Hebrew original language of the Holy Scriptures of the Old Testament.

related Information Source with the view of Rabbi
comes from http://home.earthlink.net/ ~ ecorebbe/id18.html

"... anthropological studies and social sciences have shown genetic that homosexuality is the natural state of being of some humans and other animals. If that is indeed so, God is responsible for the condition of homosexuality as God is responsible for the condition of heterosexuality. To say that homosexuality is deviant behavior is that God made a mistake.

"... Over the past decade, I have been involved in a study so-called anti-gay texts of Leviticus in the Hebrew original versions, the Dead Sea scrolls and with the help of a Catholic priest and a Protestant student of biblical languages \u200b\u200bat Emory University, have studied translations of the texts of Leviticus Greek and Latin. This study has led to the revised texts of the Hebrew Talmud and other collateral material nature to the subject being studied, the history, anthropology, archeology, philology and etymology, to name a few.

As a result of my research, I am convinced of two things:

1. LOS Original Hebrew text ABSOLUTELY NOT HAVE ANYTHING TO DO WITH HOMOSEXUALITY.

2. Texts (Leviticus and Deuteronomy) were used by teachers and rabbis of the Jewish religious tradition to condemn homosexuality only to a much later date, around 1,500 years after it was written. This change in direction occurred between the 4th century and the 6th century under the threat of the dominant and controlling governmental authorities and Christian ecclesiastical . The theologians of the church needed to have perceived the Jewish interpretation of the texts as being in accordance with their own comments and lessons concerning homosexuality and what they (falsely) believed to be a sexual perversion ... "

Time Tunnel Rabidshare Indir

Santa Sodom Scientific

Part I.

(This blog was originally created in blogs but since AOL was and having eliminated them suspected that the removal was a possibility, I kept a copy of this blog for future use.)

Since there is so much homophobic element in public forums that do not provide useful information of any kind to Discussions related to homosexuality and merely vent their prejudices, which they believe can help with biblical quotations and as postulated crazy allegedly based on scientific evidence is no such thing, I created this private blog which is not allowed entromisión a homophobic element to the benefit of the gay community and all those friends of the heterosexual community who support human rights community gay.

Today is Saturday, February 24, 2007, and just create this blog just an hour ago. In the days ahead, as my schedule allows, add text to this blog containing my opinions, scientific evidence from biology, animal behavior, genetics, anthropology, archeology, sociology, mental health and Bible studies among many other scientific disciplines related to homosexuality.

you soon. Peace and Love