Colonial Vs Aflac Insurance

Civilized Gay Police Forces Barbarians vs

European Union Shield

XIII.
really

embarrassed when one compares the intellectual quality and level of culture among the crowd of homophobic elements and modal unsophisticated savages of our "narcolegisbasura" the courtyard when engages in verbal fights seedy alley in front of Capitol brothel Puerta de Tierra in the intellectual quality and level of culture of the gentlemen and ladies in the English parliament and the English Parliament during heated debates, but in height.


rightly theirs, the European Union countries, enjoy a quality of living than ours when we are able to legislate for the human rights of the gay community as can be seen to follow.


http://www.felgt.org/temas/cooperacion-internacional/i/4646/79/resolucion-a-0028-94-del-parlamento-europeo or equivalent http://tinyurl.com Tinyurl / ym64fw


"... Considering the specific responsibility of the European Community within the framework of its activities and its powers in relation to equal treatment for all citizens, regardless of sexual orientation , General Reflections





1. Reiterates its conviction that all citizens are entitled to equal treatment irrespective of sexual orientation;


2. considers that the Community Europe is bound to ensure implementation of the principle of equal treatment irrespective of sexual orientation of people in the legal measures already taken or to be taken;


3. Also expresses its conviction that the protection of human rights should become more prevalent in the EU Treaties and calls, therefore, the institutions of the Community within the framework of institutional reform scheduled for 1996, prepare the creation of a European organization responsible for ensuring equal treatment irrespective of nationality, religion, skin pigmentation, sex, sexual orientation or other differences;


4. Calls on the Commission and the Council, as a first step to reform the human rights protection, give effect to the accession to the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights, under the work program of the Community in 1990.


A
member states

5. Calls on Member States to abolish all legal provisions that criminalize and discriminate against sex between same-sex


6. Ask the age restrictions for security purposes are identical in homosexual and heterosexual


7. Calls for an end to the unequal treatment of people orientation gay legal and administrative provisions;

8. Calls to the UK to suspend the discriminatory provisions aimed at containing the alleged spread of homosexuality, thus restoring in relation to the issue of homosexuality, freedom in matters of opinion, news, information, science and art for homosexual citizens and calls on all Member States in the future, respect these rights to freedom of expression;


9. Calls on Member States, in cooperation with national lesbian and gay, and conduct action campaigns against the growing aggression of are subject homosexual persons and to ensure the prosecution of perpetrators of these attacks;


10. Calls on Member States, in cooperation with national organizations of lesbians and gays, to adopt measures and undertake campaigns against all forms of social discrimination against homosexuals.


11. Recommends that Member States take steps to ensure that social and cultural organizations of women and gay men have access to national funds in the same conditions as other social and cultural organizations that their claims are judged under the same criteria requests from other organizations and they were not hurt by the fact that women's and gay men;


The European Community Commission


12. Calls on the Commission to present a draft recommendation on the equal rights of lesbians and gays;


13. Considers that the basis of the recommendation should be equal treatment for all EU citizens, regardless of their sexual orientation, and the end of all forms of legal discrimination based on sexual orientation, and calls on the Commission to submit a report Parliament, at intervals of five years on the situation of homosexuals in the Community;


14. Believes that the recommendation should at least try to end:


§ The existence of different ages and discriminatory consent for homosexual relations. § A
persecution of homosexuality as an offense against public order or morality. § A
all forms of discrimination in employment law and on public services and discrimination in criminal law, civil, contractual and commercial. § Al
electronic storage of data on sexual orientation of an individual without his knowledge and consent, or disclosure Unauthorized or misuse of such data.
§ A prohibition of marriage or legal regimes equivalent access to the partners of lesbian or gay, the recommendation should ensure the full rights and benefits of marriage, allowing the registration of the coexistence,
§ In any restrictions on rights of lesbians and homosexuals to be parents, to adopt or raise children;


15. Calls on the Commission, in line with the opinion of the Parliament of 19 November 1993 on the proposal for a regulation amending the Staff Regulations and the Conditions of employment of other servants of the Communities on equal treatment between men and women, start the fight against discrimination based on sexual orientation supropia personnel policy;


16. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission, the governments and parliaments of the Member States and candidate countries ... "

Shield Zamora, Spain

http://www.noticias.info/Archivo/2004/200410/20041001/20041001_34695.shtm

or equivalent links
Tinyur http://tinyurl.com/ y6od7t


"... The European Law Students Association GLBT (Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual and Transgender) Smile You live Zamora the day on Friday as a day of celebration that marks a before and after in the fight for full equality between homosexuals and heterosexuals. The adoption by the Council of Ministers of the draft bill allowing marriage to couples consisting of two persons of the same sex is "a historic event for the dignity of gays and lesbians, an unprecedented move in the recognition of equality, "said the president of Smile You, Miguel Luis Miguel Prieto. The head of the Association for GLBT Rights Zamora said that this progress in the civil rights of English citizens "there is no turning back" and concerns not only gays and lesbians but to all those committed to democratic rights and equality ...


... You Smile regretted that civil recognition of gay marriage still has a single dissenting minority voice, the hierarchy of the Catholic Church, whose attitude encourages homophobia and social exclusion of gays and lesbians. Therefore, the president of the association called on Catholic leaders to stop being contrary to the public and the majority of Catholics who "are for us to get married, we can integrate on equal terms in society to which we belong. "In this regard, he recalled that opinion surveys and find that English society is overwhelmingly in favor of marriage same-sex and Catholic groups also expressed their base position in favor ... "

New Freestyle Ramps For Sale

The Ten Commandments in the Hebrew Original

XII.

Which 10 Commandments?


To which version you mean the 10 commandments - the first given by God to Moses before Moses throw it breaking up or the second "copy" that God gave to Moses or the version of the 10 commandments Jewish, Catholic or Protestant? According to the Bible relates, Moses threw the stone tablets of the 10 commandments and shattered, and God said he would do other tables containing "the words they had in the first." The phrase "the words they had in the first" let us understand that God would reproduce an exact copy of the two tablets of the 10 commandments that Moses broke. However, as we see in Bible itself, the second version of the 10 commandments is not identical to the first.


According to the Bible, in Exodus 20, on the first tablets given to Moses the commandment # 7 says, "Do not commit adultery." PERIOD. He says adultery or fornication. Adultery is sex between two people in which one or both spouses of other people. Fornication is sex between unmarried people.


According to the Bible, in Exodus 34, the second tablets given to Moses the commandment # 7 says, "Do not offer the blood of my sacrifice with leavened bread." Obviously, they are not equal these two versions of the seventh commandment. Moreover, it appears none of the words adultery or fornication in the second tablets which had in the first. "An apparent contradiction.


In the version of the Protestant 10 Commandments, the seventh commandment says" Thou shalt not commit adultery. In the Catholic version of the seventh commandment says "Thou shalt not steal." It is in the ninth commandment as Catholicism that says, "Do not covet your neighbor's wife." And in the Jewish commandments, the seventh commandment says "Thou shalt not commit adultery."
Interestingly, the word fornication does not appear in any version, and if two unmarried people of the same sex have sex, there is no prohibition against it among the 10 commandments. Do not forget you are the 10 commandments, according to the Bible, were written by the very finger of God on stone tablets. All other prohibitions are human creations, spécifications, the religious and political leaders of ancient Israel.


The distinatas versions of the Ten Commandments can be accessed at the following link: http://www.positiveatheism.org/crt/whichcom.htm. Let me clarify that I am not an atheist Auque the link comes from http://www.positiveatheism.com/ .


Which version is true and valid today?


Referring to the discussion regarding the Saturday versus Sunday Bible texts on Saturday only recognize Jesus and his disciples observed the Sabbath. The Catholic Church based on their inheritance of power given to Peter to bind and loose on earth and also be bound in heaven, changed the Sabbath to Sunday.


Exodus, Chapter 34:27-29: "... 27 Then the LORD said to Moses: - Write these words, because according to them I made a covenant with thee and with Israel. 28 Moses was there with Jehovah forty days and forty nights. not eating bread nor drinking water. And in the tables wrote the words of the covenant: the ten commandments. 29 happened on the down Moses Mount Sinai with two tablets of testimony in his hand as he descended the mountain, Moses did not know that the skin of his face shone and have been talking with God ... "


Deuteronomy, Chapter 4:1-2 "... 1" now, O Israel, listen to the laws and decrees that I teach you to do, so that you may live and go in and take possession of the land that gives you the LORD God of your fathers. 2 do not add to the words which I command you, neither of them quitéis , that you may keep the commandments of the Lord your God which I command you ... "

If the Bible
says Moses came down from Mount Sinai with two tablets in his hands on which were written the 10 commandments, then, can argue that in each tablet could be 5 commandments written. If God gave all the 613 laws, then, it took some 122 tablets to contain them and must have had Moísres (1) massive and extremely strong hands to load with so many stone tablets, (2 ) these 613 laws were engraved in letters microscopy in two tablets (3) Moses had to have had an innate grace gazella to negotiate a decent down the slopes of the mountains with such a heavy load distributed in 122 tablets of stone.


Because of what the Bible itself says in Exodus, Chapter 34: 28 that " wrote the words of the covenant: the ten commandments ... (29) ... with two tablets of testimony in his hand ... " and Deuteronomy God says " do not add to the words which I command you, neither of them quitéis ," I believe that God gave only 10 commandments and that the other alleged prohibitions appear later in the Bible, such as not eating meat and drinking milk at a time, fabrics two different fibers like mohair blend with wool, to put under the same yoke an ox and an ass, do not eat pork ( Christmas in Puerto Rico on Route Piglet), no pick up firewood on Saturdays death penalty and other such nonsense that no Christian today, nor obey homophobic Christian fundamentalists, were created and added by ignorant judges and elders, priests and other religious leaders and policy consideration of ancient Israel.


Interestingly, my view has support in the words of Jesus in Matthew, Chapter 23:1-13 1 Then Jesus spoke to the crowd and his disciples, 2 Saying "The scribes and the Pharisees sit in the chair of Moses. 3 So, everything I say do it and keep them, but do not do according to his works, for they say and do. 4 They bind heavy burdens and grievous to be , and lay them on men's shoulders, but they themselves will not move even a finger. 5 Rather, do all their deeds to be seen by men. They make their phylacteries broad and enlarge the borders of their garments 6. They love the best seats at banquets and the chief seats in the synagogues, 7 greetings in the marketplaces and being called by men Rabbi, Rabbi. 8 "But you do not ye called Rabbi: for one is your Teacher, and all ye are brethren. 9 And call no man your Father on earth, for your Father which is in heaven is one. 10 Neither llaméis guide you, because your guide is one, the Christ. 11 But he that is greatest among you shall be your servant, 12 for he who exalts himself will be humbled, and he who humbles himself will be exalted. 13 "Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites for ye shut the kingdom of heaven against men. Well, you do not enter, nor allow those enter who are coming.


Of course, bad translated and misinterpreted Bible verses that Christian fundamentalist homophobes and others of his pint claim prohibit homosexual relationships were not included in the 10 Commandments. Were added by men wanting to ban male prostitution among the children of Israel custom was practiced by pagan neighbors surrounding ancient Israel.

How Tequila To Add To Bucket Of Margaritas

The original tome in its original jeringoza

NOTE: To continue, translated by my original text English to English, in which Jewish rabbis give their educated opinions on the alleged anti-homosexual passages in Leviticus in the original Hebrew so vaunted by ignorant homophobic Christian fundamentalists of the court, who barely know English and Hebrew, much less blatantly insist on pontificating to the four winds on which they do not know jack.

The opinions of the Jewish rabbis who received education from children to read, write and speak their ancestral mother tongue, the ancient Hebrew Bible, have credibility while the opinions of those who have no academic credentials as evidence possess expertise in biblical linguist and develop their opinions depending on foreign Bible translations are not credibility whatsoever except in his peer group who share the same ignornancia REALLY mean what the original scriptures from the Bible.

XI.

Within the Hebrew Torah readings Achare Mot (Leviticus 16: 1-18: 30) and Kedosheem (Leviticus 19: 1-20, 27) are the Bible passages that have been used by 1.600 years past, for Teachers fundamentalist Jews and Christians to wrongly prosecute and punish a small portion of the human population.

This specific texts are

Leviticus 18:22, which reads: and remembered not make love bed a woman is abomination - V-et zachar lo tishkav miskevery eeshah toeyvah hee . No te acuestes (sexualmente) con varón como lo harías con mujer, dado que esto es una abominación (TOEYVAH).

Y, Levítico 20:13, que dice: and which lie the male bed dirty woman did both be put to death their blood in them - V-eesh yishkav et asher zakar eeshah mishkevey toeyvah. Not yumatu dameyhem shenayhem Asu bam. If a man has sex with a male person in the same way as with a woman, both have committed a toeyvah (disgusting perversion.) Both will die by blood be upon them.

was at least a millennium after these verses were written in Leviticus, durantre a historical period when the Jews were in contact with a Syrian-Greek Hellenic culture that had an open hedonistic sexual promiscuous mode, the first references to Talmudic public display of homosexual activity as a perversion of Jewish religious practice are registered. (Sanhedrin 54A)

According to Rabbi Jacob Milgrom, translator and translation of the prestigious comentarisita Book of Leviticus Anchor Bible Series and Commentary on the Book of Numbers Jewish Publication Society, these texts refer to religious practices and sexual abuse sexual non-Israelites that the Israelites were not to imitate in the land of Israel. It has nothing to do with what we call today as being homosexuality.

This, then, presents us with several questions:

1. Did the Hebrew people who wrote the original text of Leviticus, saw it as referring to homosexuality as a sexual orientation or saw them to homosexuality as something of little or no real concern to normal operation of the group?

2. Did the Jewish people a thousand years later, during the time period that coincides with the beginning of Christianity, saw the homosexulidad as a problem or issue of major concern? They saw homosexuality in the same way we view homosexuality today?


3. Or is that our texts refer to prohibitions PRIESTLY only and not to sexual practices ordinary Israelis?


4. Or are the texts refer to the inability of a person within the community to control their inclinations telling sexual control their emotions, control their bodily functions? And so it does not refer to sexual orientation?

If the Torah is referring to homosexuality in general, why only way to male homosexuality and not too feminine homosexual activity?


The ancient rabbis must have had some sense of this problem when two thousand years ago any less homosexual activity anal sex was not included in the biblical prohibition (Babylonian Talmud, Yevamont 54th-56th, Sotah 26b, Niddah 13a; Maimonides, L'Perush Mishnayot on Sanhedrin 54a).

Why bother

to offer this qualification if they were so clear that homosexuality was forbidden? Similarly, lesbianism, according to Jewish law, was never banned, Maimonides, who personally hated such behavior, decreed that (homosexuality) is neither biblical or rabbinic prohibition. (Perush L'Mishnayot on Sanhedrin 54a).

The truth is that the rabbis in the Gemara (Tract Yevamot) specifically say that the passage in Leviticus refers to an androgynous and not male-male sex. As interpretations of the rabbis are the basis of halakhah, someone claiming that Judaism is against homosexual orientation based on the biblical passage is simply incorrect. (End of article by Rabbi Winkler. See SACRED SECRETS by Rabbi Gershon Winkler)